On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:06:03 + (GMT), Bart Oldeman wrote:
at first sight it looks good to me, thanks! The one thing I saw that might
have to be changed is the location of the new stack. Since RBIL table 1690
(very end of interrupt.g)
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:01:22 + (GMT), Bart Oldeman wrote:
Yes we should care! This area is used by all sorts of TSRs and network
redirectors that live under DOS. These fixed locations cannot be changed
without breaking apps that rely on undocumented DOS in various ways.
I see. Do you mean that
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:06:03 + (GMT), Bart Oldeman wrote:
at first sight it looks good to me, thanks! The one thing I saw that might
have to be changed is the location of the new stack. Since RBIL table 1690
(very end of interrupt.g) specifies a few variables up to 7d? and this new
stack
