Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: 2F-122F

2004-09-13 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 13-Сен-2004 12:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >>> In addition, the MS-ish interface allows "revert to real version >>> number" by passing a value of zero. >> RBIL doesn't says this. LG> It does say this. D-2F122F says: DX = DOS version number (h = ret

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: 2F-122F

2004-09-13 Thread Luchezar Georgiev
In addition, the MS-ish interface allows "revert to real version number" by passing a value of zero. RBIL doesn't says this. It does say this. D-2F122F says: DX = DOS version number (h = return true DOS version). RBIL also says this is supported by Matthias Paul's FREEVER.COM. Do you see now

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: 2F-122F

2004-09-13 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 13-Сен-2004 04:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: EA> how to use it that way ;-). In addition, the MS-ish interface allows EA> "revert to real version number" by passing a value of zero. The extra RBIL doesn't says this. EA> few bytes are really VERY few bytes

[Freedos-kernel] Re: 2F-122F

2004-09-12 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Aitor! > I have to agree with Arkady. Two things why I feel it could be inconvenient: > - the extra few bytes it takes > - the fact that, being unique to MS-DOS 4.0... Well... it was my idea to move this functionality from a FreeDOS-only function number to an MS-DOS-4.00-only function number.