Hi!
21--2004 17:06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I use both features (F3 and Ins to edit command line) in MS-DOS often.
BTW, they are also available in DEBUG. Isn't this mean, that editing
features built-in into kernel?
LG Yes. They're implemented in
I mean: is this mean, that editing code is/should duplicated in kernel
and command.com?
As far as I know, no. FreeCOM has its own command line editor with history
and auto-competion.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
AVB 1. In kernel present editing code.
yes.
AVB 2. If code presented in command.com, how this affects other programs (say,
AVBDEBUG)?
command.com implements it's own doswedit-style input editor.
it doesn't affect other programs (it's not exported)
tom
I mean: is this mean, that editing code is/should duplicated in kernel
and command.com?
As far as I know, no. FreeCOM has its own command line editor with
history and auto-completion.
But:
1. In kernel present editing code.
2. If code presented in command.com, how this affects other programs
Hi!
21--2004 19:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Arkady V.Belousov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I again send not finished sentence. :( I mean:
AVB 1. In kernel present editing code.
te yes.
...then which reason to reimplement this in command.com?
AVB 2. If code presented in
Hi!
15--2004 21:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FreeCOM) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
at given position. For example, if (in buffer) was typed C:\DOS, then in
MS-DOS
- right arrow 3 times shows C:\;
- Ins, FD shows C:\FD;
- F3 shows C:\FDDOS.
F I didn't know this feature. Added to the to-do list.
The F3-style command line editing is in the kernel because function 0Ah
(3Fh when reading from standard input) in MS-DOS does it. Period. As to
FreeCOM, it has a better (4DOS-style) command line editing and I don't see
a reason for a separate DOSEDIT. Period. I'll not answer anymore.
