Johnson Lam escreveu:
I always have 20, but my point is 20 is for user application, system should
not count in the list, since they are a must.
Buffers are alocated dinamicaly which is a better aproach than reserving
some for this and some for that...
What I don't understand is why you
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:41:20 +0100, you wrote:
to fix any bug, it must be reproduced first.
As noone has ghost 5, 'the bug' can't be reproduced, and so can't be fixed.
Downloaded the kwc38632.dev.zip, dated 2006-07-14, nothing changed.
Eric just ask me to test in private email (again), I have no
Johnson Lam escreveu:
Did you mean set the FILES=2 really have 2 buffers?
This *should not* happen, DOS opens 5 files by default: stdin, stdout,
stderr, auxin and aux out. An extra one is needed with dos extenders. I
would say that 7 or 8 would be a minimum to keep things running.
By
--- Johnson Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:41:20 +0100, you wrote:
to fix any bug, it must be reproduced first.
As noone has ghost 5, 'the bug' can't be reproduced, and so can't be
fixed.
Downloaded the kwc38632.dev.zip, dated 2006-07-14, nothing changed.
Eric
Hello,
2007/10/27, Johnson Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:19:07 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Aitor,
You're wasting precious time on outdated programs.
It might discover one more serious bug.
Most people will run Ghost 8 and 2003 on FreeDOS (including me), I
don't have a Ghost 5
Hopefully someone can found the bug and fix it, my pathetic knowledge
forbid me to help.
to fix any bug, it must be reproduced first.
As noone has ghost 5, 'the bug' can't be reproduced, and so can't be fixed.
end of story.
Tom
Hi Johnson,
1658 Ghost 5.1 fails: Needs somebody with Ghost 5.1 to fix
Just try Ghost 8.0 and Ghost 2003, if they work don't stick to Ghost
5.1, there MAYBE problem due to 5.1.
You're wasting precious time on outdated programs.
Maybe true, but I do not have ANY version of Ghost to test :-(
1658 Ghost 5.1 fails: Needs somebody with Ghost 5.1 to fix
Maybe true, but I do not have ANY version of Ghost to test :-(
If a newer version of Ghost works, then we could indeed set
the bug status to wontfix and mention that newer versions
do work fine. Or we could lower bug priority to
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:19:07 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Aitor,
You're wasting precious time on outdated programs.
It might discover one more serious bug.
Most people will run Ghost 8 and 2003 on FreeDOS (including me), I
don't have a Ghost 5 to run, if Ghost 2003 works fine, I see no reason
to
Hi everybody,
Tom just said in the A Poll of sorts thread on -devel:
just kick out the useless 2037 kernel
(merge any useful stuff into 2038); that's it
Unfortunately, 2037 has an immense amount of changes
and is based on 2035a. Still it would be interesting
if people could mention some
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:53:03 +0200 (MEST), you wrote:
Dear Developers,
1658 Ghost 5.1 fails: Needs somebody with Ghost 5.1 to fix
Please!!
Just try Ghost 8.0 and Ghost 2003, if they work don't stick to Ghost
5.1, there MAYBE problem due to 5.1.
You're wasting precious time on outdated
Hello Johnson,
2007/10/27, Johnson Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:53:03 +0200 (MEST), you wrote:
Dear Developers,
1658 Ghost 5.1 fails: Needs somebody with Ghost 5.1 to fix
Please!!
Just try Ghost 8.0 and Ghost 2003, if they work don't stick to Ghost
5.1, there MAYBE
12 matches
Mail list logo
