Did you run guest to load the drivers for the parallel port Zip Drive?
Yes, and it worked for me.
I tried it three months ago and I could not get it to work. Kernel
version is 2.1.34.
I had composed a simple batch file (LOADZIP.BAT) to replace GUEST and
consume less memory. It's dated 2 May 2004
Hallo Bart,
Question is how much of a difference can you tolerate? From you I get
the impression that a 100K uncompressed kernel that compresses to 3
bytes would be preferable to a 64K one that compresses to 4 bytes.
;-) I could never use an uncompressed kernel that is below 64 KB.
Hallo Tom,
It's not worth a penny because it can be freely downloaded from Vietnam
(I posted the URL here ;-)
I know bulgarians think that way.
Not only Bulgarians. 3/4 of the world thinks so. And many Americans and
Germans too, by the way.
It's still theft.
It would be a theft if I *move* the
interesting loading option, I have SCSI internal zip100 iomega drive.
Does DEVLOAD 3.13 also work for you instead of DYNALOAD?
(no idea if we have put it online somewhere, though :( )
I haven't tried it, but there is no reason why it shouldn't work.
Hello Luchezar,
It's not worth a penny because it can be freely downloaded from Vietnam
(I posted the URL here ;-)
I know bulgarians think that way.
Not only Bulgarians. 3/4 of the world thinks so. And many Americans and
Germans too, by the way.
there is a german saying
'hey guys - eat
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
Hallo Bart,
Question is how much of a difference can you tolerate? From you I get
the impression that a 100K uncompressed kernel that compresses to 3
bytes would be preferable to a 64K one that compresses to 4 bytes.
;-) I could
