Hi!
5--2005 22:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Eric Auer
freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net:
te and while I agree completely with what he wrote, IMO he slightly
te missed the point (and you -eric- miss it completely)
The whole point is that if you remove the break; completely, then
Hi Tom,
the whole point is that in a shared programming effort (as the freedos
kernel still should be) it's a waste of resources to change ANYTHING
without a certain payback.
Lucho's payback is clear. He compiles with Borland C and compresses the
result, so that the *compressed* kernel fits
Eric Auer schreef:
PS: Which kernels contain the DOSLFN compatibility patch (improved
xBPB/DPB initialization and set extended error code implemented),
only the development kernels at www.fdos.org/kernel, I think. Jeremy has
been active lately. Only thing missing by default is that IF a
Hello Eric,
Hi guys, interesting anecdote from Pat, but:
yes, it was interesting to see Pat watching this list at all.
and while I agree completely with what he wrote, IMO he slightly
missed the point (and you -eric- miss it completely)
The whole point is that if you remove the break;
