Re: [Freedos-user] odd news

2024-05-08 Thread Ben Collver via Freedos-user
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 00:29:44 +0200 > From: Eric Auer > > and a dos port of gnupg where important features cannot be used > because dos has no /dev/random (see bttr thread) be newsworthy? The DOS port of gnupg should be fully functional now, both on FreeDOS and MS-DOS. When generating keys,

Re: [Freedos-user] dos navigator

2024-05-08 Thread Travis Siegel via Freedos-user
On Wed, 8 May 2024, Daniel Essin via Freedos-user wrote: Try it in a VM Yeah, I would, but that's not really an option for me. On 5/8/24 6:21 PM, Travis Siegel via Freedos-user wrote: I found my copy of PTS DOS Source, and was digging through them to see some of the differences between t

Re: [Freedos-user] dos navigator

2024-05-08 Thread Daniel Essin via Freedos-user
Try it in a VM On 5/8/24 6:21 PM, Travis Siegel via Freedos-user wrote: I found my copy of PTS DOS Source, and was digging through them to see some of the differences between that and opendos, for which I also have the sources, and I ran across the dos navigator menuing system (at least I'm pr

[Freedos-user] dos navigator

2024-05-08 Thread Travis Siegel via Freedos-user
I found my copy of PTS DOS Source, and was digging through them to see some of the differences between that and opendos, for which I also have the sources, and I ran across the dos navigator menuing system (at least I'm pretty sure it's a menu system, don't currently have a dos machine setup an

Re: [Freedos-user] odd news

2024-05-08 Thread Jim Hall via Freedos-user
[..] > 1. I keep an eye on the "DOS Ain't Dead" forums via their RSS feed, > and I thought the httpDOS announcement on "DOS Ain't Dead" was > interesting. And we sometimes (not all the time, but sometimes) get > people who ask what cool network stuff they can do with FreeDOS. And > this was somethi

Re: [Freedos-user] odd news

2024-05-08 Thread Jim Hall via Freedos-user
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 5:30 PM Eric Auer via Freedos-user wrote: > > > hi! as jim prefers all dos related things to be discussed on-list: > > why would a https server which is "not in real working condition" > and a dos port of gnupg where important features cannot be used > because dos has no /de

[Freedos-user] odd news

2024-05-08 Thread Eric Auer via Freedos-user
hi! as jim prefers all dos related things to be discussed on-list: why would a https server which is "not in real working condition" and a dos port of gnupg where important features cannot be used because dos has no /dev/random (see bttr thread) be newsworthy? the changes to nasm do not seem to