Re: [Freedos-user] DUSE 4.9 (USB driver) conflict with HIMEM64

2004-06-16 Thread Johnson Lam
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:41:49 -0500, you wrote: Hi Michael, I agree, but what can you do? It doesn't work; it won't ever work. The driver was written to be fundamentally incompatible with EMM386's environment. I've spent a lot of money to because of the sucking driver! I prepare External USB

Re: [Freedos-user] DUSE 4.9 (USB driver) conflict with HIMEM64

2004-06-15 Thread Johnson Lam
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:29:28 -0500, you wrote: Hi Michael, Nothing unexpected here. You cannot use EMM386 with a program which is (badly) written so as to not work under virtual 8086 mode. Use HIMEM only. IMHO, device drivers is so IMPORTANT. The manufacturer should maximum the stability and

[Freedos-user] DUSE 4.9 (USB driver) conflict with HIMEM64

2004-06-13 Thread Johnson Lam
Hi, I wonder Michael is still watching the mailing list or not ... I've installed a new USB hard disk with DUSE 4.9 driver and found that DUSE must run under non-protected mode. So I put the driver before HIMEM64 and found that it'll affect the HIMEM detection and cause the Kernel or FreeCOM to

Re: [Freedos-user] DUSE 4.9 (USB driver) conflict with HIMEM64

2004-06-13 Thread Michael Devore
Nothing unexpected here. You cannot use EMM386 with a program which is (badly) written so as to not work under virtual 8086 mode. Use HIMEM only. UBMPCI if it works, since it uses BIOS hardware rather than software to get UMB's. Loading before HIMEM is asking for trouble since DUSE