Re: [Freedos-user] counterproductive UPX usage for loadhigh display /maybe other drivers also/?

> On Jan 3, 2018, at 3:29 AM, Rugxulo wrote: >> […] >> wrong. this behaviour should simply be fixed, as the fix is trivial: >> >> get a recent UPX. >> decompress. >> recompress. >> wait for FreeDOS 2.0 to have this fix published. > > I have followed

Re: [Freedos-user] counterproductive UPX usage for loadhigh display /maybe other drivers also/?

Hi, On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote: > >> Hi, I just tried to 'lh display', but it always ends in conventional >> memory (code, codepages are perhaps in XMS): > > fortunately, after recompressing with the current UPX, the minimum > required load size is

Re: [Freedos-user] counterproductive UPX usage for loadhigh display /maybe other drivers also/?

Hi, > Hi, I just tried to 'lh display', but it always ends in conventional > memory (code, codepages are perhaps in XMS): ... > I myself explain this that the UPX-ed program is probably going to UMB, > but after its decompression, its resident part will no longer fit there > for some reason and

[Freedos-user] counterproductive UPX usage for loadhigh display /maybe other drivers also/?

Hi, I just tried to 'lh display', but it always ends in conventional memory (code, codepages are perhaps in XMS): C:\>mem /c Modules using memory below 1 MB: NameTotal Conventional Upper Memory