Re: [Freedos-user] Announce: EDIT 0.7c pre-release :-)

2005-08-18 Thread Charlie Wilkes
I'm confused, Eric. My version of Edit is labeled 0.7d. I have been using it for awhile now and I like it a lot, with the calendar and the ascii table. It seems to be stable, too. What do you consider your best version to be at this point? The way the program is now, it makes the most of a

Re: [Freedos-user] Announce: EDIT 0.7c pre-release :-)

2005-08-18 Thread Charlie Wilkes
My apologies... I had my mailbox out of queue! Charlie --- Charlie Wilkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm confused, Eric. My version of Edit is labeled 0.7d. I have been using it for awhile now and I like it a lot, with the calendar and the ascii table. It seems to be stable, too. What

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS FDISK issue with Windows Build

2005-08-18 Thread Gerry Hickman
Hi Bernd, Here are the latest tests from today using the new SYS 3.6; it did not solve the problem, but the issues are narrowed down. It all comes down to getting an MS boot sector onto a FAT16 partition, but without any other system files (IO.SYS etc). The first test below which failed, is

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS FDISK issue with Windows Build

2005-08-18 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Gerry Hickman schreef: Perhaps the simple solution is to have a SYS command line switch, that allows the end-user to install a 512b boot sector of their choice to the target partition? This would get round any copyright issues and make it very flexible. I don't think this is possible with the

[Freedos-user] Posting delays

2005-08-18 Thread Gerry Hickman
Hi, My message from yesterday evening about Windows Builds has only just shown up in my mailbox - that's over 24 hours! The time stamp shows the time I posted it. I also checked the FreeDOS mail archive earlier today (in case it was an issue with my ISP) and the message was not on the

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS FDISK issue with Windows Build

2005-08-18 Thread Gerry Hickman
Hi Bernd, Bootsectors contain geometry (disk/partition layout information) which can change. So this is all a matter of just copying bootsectors and omitting system files, it seems. I don't understand this statement. Do you mean to say So this is _not_ a matter of just copying bootsectors.

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS FDISK issue with Windows Build

2005-08-18 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Gerry Hickman schreef: I don't understand this statement. Do you mean to say So this is _not_ a matter of just copying bootsectors. If it _is_ a matter of just copying bootsectors, why does it seem so difficult to make it work? We just copy the boot sector and live happily ever after?

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS FDISK issue with Windows Build

2005-08-18 Thread Gerry Hickman
Hi Bernd, OK, in that case the whole thing is much more complicated than I realized. The only way this could ever work is if FreeDOS SYS or FORMAT could emulate the MS boot sector _and_ geometry behavior. As you say, WinImage does seem to manage this. In terms of copyright, the end user

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS FDISK issue with Windows Build

2005-08-18 Thread Johnson Lam
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:59:00 +0200, you wrote: Hi Bernd, In sourcecode, SYS v3.6 is still under development :) If you didn't write here, I don't even know there're hidden switch, how can I test? Without enough testing, more delay to an official release ... this function may help to installing