Johnson Lam wrote:
Clam have no official for DOS (DOS version port by Blair Campbell,
have some minor problems), and without a nice UI like F-PROT.
You forget to mention F-Prot's resident shield or reliability. ClamAV is
far from perfect and so it is NOT a replacement for F-Prot.
Robert
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:24:06 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Robert,
You forget to mention F-Prot's resident shield or reliability. ClamAV is
far from perfect and so it is NOT a replacement for F-Prot.
Oh! I forgot, thanks for reminding me, it's been a long time.
I use F-PROT because SCAN become slow
Just to add to the issue regarding virus checkers. If you looking something
that's pretty up to date all the time for dos. Try AVG, when you install
it under windows 98 It knows there's dos still there and adds like a dos
scan option, point being, you can then ask it to create a few floppies
Can F-Prot load a TSR that provides a resident shield? I have always
assumed that F-Prot only operates as a scanner, whether in interactive or
command-line mode. I looked at READ_ME.TXT and COMMAND.TXT again now, and I
find no mention of a resident mode. But I would be happy to find that it
John Hupp wrote:
Can F-Prot load a TSR that provides a resident shield? I have always
No. Sorry, my mistake. :-(
Frisk Software stopped VIRSTOP development with F-Prot version 3.0. Last
(non-free) VIRSTOP seems to be
ftp://ftp.f-secure.com/anti-virus/free/286/fp-228b.zip
Robert Riebisch
--
I'm evaluating a freeware program manager called Access and wanted to
capture some screenshots, but so far it has defied everything I've tried:
VideoThief, Screen Thief, SuperClip and Windows 98's built-in utility.
(Except that VideoThief will capture about the top 2/3 of the screen.) In
Win
John Hupp schreef:
I'm guessing that one of you developers will size this little challenge up
in short order.
Emulators might do the trick. Some host platform, install emulator on
it, install DOS + your program manager inside the emulator.
Bernd
--
Efficiency is intelligent lazyness
Thanks, Bernd! That did the trick. DosBox was somewhat unstable while
running the program, but I got what I wanted out of it.
- Original Message -
From: Bernd Blaauw
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user]
Gerry Hickman wrote:
Hi,
Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't WfW a different operating system
with it's own bootsector and startup files? You've then got the HIMEM,
EMM386 and IFSHLP to worry about.
Isn't it a bit like saying why can't I start OS/2 from within CP/M?
No, it is just a
