Re: [Freedos-user] LBA And FreeDOS.

2013-12-08 Thread Rugxulo
Hi,

On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:04 PM, TJ Edmister damag...@hyakushiki.net wrote:
 On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 23:29:14 -0500, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:

 BTW, NT 4.0 (1996?) didn't support either of those

 NT4 does support LFNs.

Not in DOS apps, I meant, no Win9x-era int 21h, 71xxh, AFAIK.

 It supports FAT12/16 and NTFS out of the box, and
 with a patched system file it will support FAT32 also (same goes for
 NT3.51)

Is the patch officially part of some service pack or is it third-party?

 The service packs are free, but the full releases are not. Admittedly,
 it's not that cheap anymore (something like $199 upgrades, on
 average??, IIRC), but there's no other choice (if you want to run
 modern Windows software). Blame all the developers who refuse to
 restrict themselves to a common denominator, so everyone is constantly
 having to upgrade the OS just to support userland stuff. Even latest
 IE won't run on anything less than Win7.

 It's not necessarily even the developers' fault, except that they use
 Microsoft's compiler, and hence Microsoft gets to determine the minimum OS
 version that things built with their compiler will run on.

You'd think XP's APIs would be good enough for anything reasonable,
after all these years, but no.

 But XP is almost dead.

 XP is still widely used. Who actually still needs support from MS for a
 12-year-old product for any reason other than to say they have it (in
 other words, ass-covering)? Surely if someone has been using it this long
 then it is getting the job done?

Eventually various projects are going to stop supporting it. The same
thing happened with Win9x and Win2k. It's not technical reasons, it's
not lack of time, it's just apathy. They don't want it to work, thus
it won't work. I don't know why, but most developers are very rigid.

 Yeah, modern computing is a mess.

 Maybe if we wish really hard, all the folks who have been making such
 messes will forget about desktop computing in favor of consumer
 electronics (tablets/phones) and the desktop will become better for it.

Doubt it.

--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK 
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] LBA And FreeDOS.

2013-12-08 Thread Louis Santillan
With all this talk of really old NTs, is there a reason ReactOS wouldn't
work for some of you?
--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK 
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] LBA And FreeDOS.

2013-12-08 Thread TJ Edmister
On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:13:29 -0500, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:


 It supports FAT12/16 and NTFS out of the box, and
 with a patched system file it will support FAT32 also (same goes for
 NT3.51)

 Is the patch officially part of some service pack or is it third-party?


I checked the site where I found it and it says the author is unknown.  
http://bearwindows.boot-land.net/winnt351.htm


--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK 
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user