I don't understand why you guys are responding to this :)
The guy landed in my killfile many messages ago already, and the only
thing that reminds me of him are responses from others.
Please adjust your filters (or set up a ml ban, for these of you who are
able to do so).
Mateusz
On
whatever your reason is: forget it.
DONE! I spent all day yesterday setting up XFDOS and even though my time
with it was somewhat limited, I found XFDOS much easier to set up thant
OpenGEM. It is the best GUI I have seen yet. I want this to be a priority
for the primary GUI for FreeDOS.
On Wed,
Great Stuff! GNU OpenSource
2015-05-20 21:46 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
Yes Software diden´t work!
2015-05-20 21:41 GMT+02:00, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/2015 12:22 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Sorry! too Old hardware.
? Care to explain WHY?
Ralf
---
Yes i know it... 8080 Intel 2x86 3x86 Dx/Sx intel MMX amdSSE SSE2.
2015-05-20 21:48 GMT+02:00, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/2015 12:46 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Yes Software diden´t work!
That's not an explanation. And it's DOS for crying out loud. There can't
be any hardware too
Fuck youself...
2015-05-20 22:01 GMT+02:00, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/2015 12:59 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Great Stuff! GNU OpenSource
You really need to work on the way you are trying to express yourself. I
don't understand one bi of your comments in regards to the Infocom
On 5/20/2015 12:59 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Great Stuff! GNU OpenSource
You really need to work on the way you are trying to express yourself. I
don't understand one bi of your comments in regards to the Infocom game
engine...
Ralf
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
Shell CMD 4dos its a storry about computers.
2015-05-20 22:10 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
Fuck youself...
2015-05-20 22:01 GMT+02:00, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/2015 12:59 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Great Stuff! GNU OpenSource
You really need to work on
On 5/20/2015 1:08 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Yes i know it... 8080 Intel 2x86 3x86 Dx/Sx intel MMX amdSSE SSE2.
Doesn't look like it...
Ralf
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
On 5/20/2015 12:22 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Sorry! too Old hardware.
? Care to explain WHY?
Ralf
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
--
One dashboard for
On 5/20/2015 12:46 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Yes Software diden´t work!
That's not an explanation. And it's DOS for crying out loud. There can't
be any hardware too old to run a DOS program on...
Ralf
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Yes Software diden´t work!
2015-05-20 21:41 GMT+02:00, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/2015 12:22 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Sorry! too Old hardware.
? Care to explain WHY?
Ralf
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Sorry! too Old hardware.
2015-05-20 20:38 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr:
Here the result with Frotz v2.43. Same computer, same game:
http://s11.postimg.org/y8fknk0rn/frotz_v2_43_lost_pig.jpg
Mateusz
On 19/05/2015 23:25, David Griffith wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Mateusz
Here the result with Frotz v2.43. Same computer, same game:
http://s11.postimg.org/y8fknk0rn/frotz_v2_43_lost_pig.jpg
Mateusz
On 19/05/2015 23:25, David Griffith wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Mateusz Viste wrote:
Hello David,
First of all thanks for still caring about DOS in 2015, and on
Good news is that Frotz v2.32 works fine. I played the Lost Pig game
for about 20 minutes and I didn't experienced any crash.
My guess is that you have a fishy memory usage in newer versions of
frotz - following an invalid pointer, or writing to non-allocated
memory, or so...
good luck :)
Hi,
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr wrote:
Here the result with Frotz v2.43. Same computer, same game:
http://s11.postimg.org/y8fknk0rn/frotz_v2_43_lost_pig.jpg
At risk of asking the obvious, what major DOS version / vendor is the
OP (David) developing on? Is
I don't know details, but I guess the OP is developing on some emulation
machine, like DOSemu or DOSBox, and it works fine for him there. This
happened to me in the past - emulated environment are apparently more
resilient to bugs than a real machine.
I doubt that using a DJGPP version is a
16 matches
Mail list logo
