> Something else that should work if you don't want to modify it, add
> /low option which will also bypass the problematic code.
> Tom's workaround will be in svn kernel soon, but I need to do some
> more testing as I'm still getting crashes, but haven't determined if
> its because of memory
> Am 11.02.2016 um 14:55 schrieb :
>
> Something else that should work if you don't want to modify it, add /low
> option which will also bypass the problematic code.
>
Oh, that’s interesting. If I load the original, unpatched INTERLNK.EXE in