Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 Package LSM Data Verification

Finally, the problem and path to a solution in a nutshell, I concur. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Rugxulo wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:50 PM, dmccunney > wrote: > > > > Going back to cases, what prompted this discussion was Rex

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 Package LSM Data Verification

Hi, On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:50 PM, dmccunney wrote: > > Going back to cases, what prompted this discussion was Rex Conn's open > source license for 4DOS, which indicated his source code couldn't be > used in a *commercial* product without contacting him. There was

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 Package LSM Data Verification

> On May 17, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote: > >>CRYNWR - Unknown License, Dropped. > >>GCDROM - Listed as GPL, No Sources, Based on XCDROM, Removed. > > GCDROM sources are available. > > >>UIDE - Free for non-commercial, Removed. >>

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 Package LSM Data Verification

Hi, On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:52 PM, dmccunney wrote: > > What we now face is a situation where work might *never* lapse into > the public domain. > > The US is currently Life + 70 years. Totally logical, you pinko commie swine! (extreme sarcasm) > Canada is still

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 - Preview 17

Hi, thanks for the response! On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Kenneth Davis wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Rugxulo wrote: >> >> I notice that there is seemingly one bug / regression > > Try http://www.fdos.org/kernel/testing/truename/KERNEL.SYS

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 Package LSM Data Verification

> CRYNWR - Unknown License, Dropped. > GCDROM - Listed as GPL, No Sources, Based on XCDROM, Removed. GCDROM sources are available. > UIDE - Free for non-commercial, Removed. > UMBPCI - Listed as free, No sources, Dropped. > XCDROM - Removed. an