Rugxulo wrote:
Hi again,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/10/2015 5:34 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
But again, DOSEMU isn't widely deployed, so lots of people don't use
it. It still works fairly well, just not popular. I'm not sure if that
will ever
Ralf Quint wrote:
On 2/9/2015 7:57 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
Hi Eric,
thanks for help,
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi Franta,
struct dosemu_detect {
char magic[8];
unsigned char ver[4];
};
static struct dosemu_detect far *p = (void far
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi Franta,
I got the impression that string declared as
char mystring[]=$DOSEMU$;
is in memory stored as null-terminated string.
This does not help you: The OTHER string STARTS
with $DOSEMU$, but is NOT null terminated, so
both strings still differ. Unless you
Hi Eric,
thanks for help,
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi Franta,
struct dosemu_detect {
char magic[8];
unsigned char ver[4];
};
static struct dosemu_detect far *p = (void far*) 0xF000FFE0;
Note that the way how you create far pointers can differ
Hi all,
I'm trying to write a small program that will distinguish whether
running under dosemu/FreeDOS or not, and accordingly do other things.
I ran into problems which I can not solve, so please, if someone
here will be able to help. I'm using Open Watcom C 1.9 compiler on
FreeDOS 1.1. And it
Jack Jackson wrote:
I've noticed a difference in command line parsing between FreeDOS and
PC-DOS.
Both FreeDOS and PC-DOS put the command line, starting with the
character after the executable, in a buffer at offset 0x80 in the PSP.
The behavior difference I see with FreeDOS is if the
Hi all more experienced,
I'm trying to revise and update dosemu-freedos package (subset of
FreeDOS stuff used in DOSEMU usual installation) and I'm not sure,
what is better - whether packaged programs by UPX or not. Actual
dosemu-freedos-1.0-bin.tgz contains 40+ binaries, roughly half of
them is
Dale E Sterner wrote:
My machines are all old and use only IDE. As for SATA I don't see how
that could be better.
The S stands for serial or one bit at a time. A SATA drive interface has
only 4 lines going
into it vs IDE which has 44 lines. On SATA 2 lines are for power, the
other 2 lines
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi!
Not sure if this helps, but DISPLAY CON=(EGA,,1) should
be sufficient for all your needs. For the font support,
EGA is pretty much the same as VGA and display only is
for loading custom fonts. If you do not plan to load a
non-BIOS font, you do not even need display
George Frothingham wrote:
Can anyone suggest a source for monochrome laser printers with parallel
interface that will work on FreeDOS.
Regards George Frothingham
IMO these two should work well:
1) Epson WorkForce AL-M300D: A4/Letter laser printer, USB+paralel,
duplex printing,
Dietmar Segbert wrote:
Hello,
i have installed dosemu with freedos on my netbook with debian wheezy.
I have some old dos programms to burn cds and read cd-images, called dao
and snapshot ...
I have also a portable dvd-writer samsung se-208db, which is in linux
/dev/sr0.
How can i
11 matches
Mail list logo
