I am a little late in responding; moving an entire house of belongings
and children is not fun.
Mateusz provided a good explanation - it is active vs. passive mode
connections. Back 15 years ago before NAT was in widespread use all FTP
connections were active. The client would initiate a
On 8/14/2014 3:52 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
Hi Ulrich,
Thanks for your feedback!
On 08/14/2014 12:05 AM, Ulrich wrote:
FDNPKG installs the MTCP programs into C:\FDOS\MTCP instead of C:\FDOS\BIN.
This is not really about FDNPKG, but more about how packages are
structured. Indeed, I tend to
Before we claim that mTCP is not compatible with FDAPM, what FDAPM
options are you using?
fdapm apmdos has worked for me before. My notes are in power.txt.
Mike
--
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms
On 8/4/2014 3:18 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
* Running a mTCP FTP server on the DOS machine (Matej, Michael, Ulrich)
- this is nice, although I'd prefer keeping the DOS PC as a simple
'client'.
I am confused by this. Both the FTP client and FTP server are DOS EXE
programs. Why would
On 8/4/2014 7:10 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
BTW, I also tried the FTP client that comes with mTCP, but it proved to
be hardly useable on my PC. Dunno what's wrong, the symptom is that it
reacts very poorly to keyboard input, at every keypress, I have to wait
like 1s or 2 for the character to
mTCP provides three options:
- an FTP client for DOS. Not point and click user friendly, but it
does what it is supposed to do.
- HTGET for downloading a file from an HTTP server
- an FTP server for DOS. This allows you to use a graphical FTP client
on another machine.
For when I want real
A little more notoriety ...
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/07/dos-boot-ars-spends-a-day-working-in-freedos/
I don't regularly check Ars Technica. I was alerted by the sound of my
PCjr happily beeping away at an increased rate; the PCjr is running the
mTCP web server as an
I have noticed quite a few code bloat issues with the Watcom C runtime.
For some of the more obscure functions it is often better to write some
inline assembly and make the DOS or BIOS call directly than it is to use
the corresponding C runtime function. The stat() family of functions
are a
Synchronizing the sending of bits over parallel interfaces is much more
difficult than it is to send a single serial bit stream. As a result,
you can send that single serial stream of bits faster than you can do it
in parallel across multiple wires.
SCSI went through this transition when
Some of you out there are mTCP users, so this should interest you ...
I have a PCjr running an early version of the mTCP web server. It is
serving (most) of its own web site:
http://67.185.176.54:8080/
That link has the main page, and it should look like my normal PCjr web
site. This next
I am not one to find fault with other people's work for the joy of
finding fault, but I am having a hard time seeing how this code is
useful or relevant:
- The headers that it is putting at the top of the file are fixed in
format. You still have to edit the output to change the string author
On 5/25/2013 1:45 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
GPL, so patches welcome! :-)
Patch what? This code is so tragically flawed and devoid of purpose
that there is nothing worth patching. The patch to make it useful and
get rid of the obvious problems that I pointed out would be bigger than
the original
Rugxulo,
Sometimes I have to wonder about your competence ...
I'm done ranting for now. Enjoy looking forward to 0.0.2.
-Mike
--
Try New Relic Now We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based
Just a warning - a user reported to me that Netcat was not working
correctly in this version. It turned out to be a build script problem.
Nothing else was affected.
I have placed a new version of the executables on the web site with a
new version number. Please update if you use Netcat or
The old official IRC channel at irc.i7c.org does not work anymore,
probably because i7c.org is no longer running an IRC server. Worse, i7c
looks like an unconfigured virtual server.
Can we designate a new IRC channel on a network that is better
supported? And then update
And nearly another year has passed by ...
This version includes:
* All: improved TCP/IP lost packet and retransmit support
* All: DHCP lease expiration detection and warning
* IRCjr: mIRC color codes, improved logging support, 132 column
awareness, bug fixes
* FTP client: user input can be
Hilarious ...
That picture with the cute little old printer on it was lifted from one
of my web pages:
http://www.brutman.com/PCjr/pc_compact_printer.html
The ragged paper line matches perfectly.
Mike
On 2/1/2013 12:32 AM, john s wolter wrote:
I received an EMail from printfil.com
On 2/1/2013 1:10 PM, john s wolter wrote:
Michael,
Did you produce that image originally? If so and it is copyrighted
you could ask for it to be removed.
Cheers,
John S Wolter
It is my image - I own the printer and took the picture. However, it is
not worth pursuing. I wish people
Most people have a favorite editor already; you have an uphill battle
if you think that one editor can replace the rest. Here are some
comments on your feature list:
- 8088 class machines should be supported. There is nothing in the
80286 or 80386 opcode set that should be required for a
On 1/29/2013 11:09 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote:
- An editor should be small enough to run on a 128K machine.
FreeDOS will not run on a 128K machine.
Ok. Then make it 256. You get the idea.
I haven't looked into the source code, but is FreeDOS really that much
of a memory hog where it will not boot
Tom,
Get up on the wrong side of the bed today? Why so defensive?
PC/MS DOS 5.x and 6.x will run in 256K with usable memory to spare.
PC/MS DOS 3.x will run in 128K with usable memory to spare. If FreeDOS
is designed/optimized for a bigger footprint then that's fair, but there
is nothing
On 1/7/2013 5:34 AM, Russell Benson wrote:
Hi I have loaded freedos and I get to Welcome To FreeDos Operating system
C:\
What do I need to do to get into the system?
That is probably the best/only laugh I have ever had on this mailing
list ...
It reminds me of the introduction to an old
The time to consider DOS compatibility is *before* you purchase the printer.
If your printer can do some form of PCL then you are probably safe. A
higher end HP laser printer should definitely understand PCL. Old Epson
printer emulation and PostScript would be acceptable too - a Brother
First, the good news - Watcom includes code at the start and end of each
function to detect stack overflows. It is a lot easier to debug code
when you know what the root cause of the problem is. If the stack
overflow were to happen and remain silent, you could have all sorts of
strange
On 12/20/2012 2:41 PM, Tom Ehlert wrote:
asking programming errors on a mailing list that is focused on
operating system development is considered BAD.
I don't think we have enough developers (OS or application) or enough
list traffic where we can afford to be picky ...
Mike
On 12/20/2012 3:11 PM, Ralf A. Quint wrote:
At 12:58 PM 12/20/2012, Louis Santillan wrote:
The Memory Model (Tiny vs. Small vs. Compact vs. Medium vs. Large,
.COM vs. .EXE) of the compiler could be causing the issue. Some
compilers used to default to Small. What compiler flags are you using?
mTCP sounds right. ; - 0
The latest versions are at Google Code: https://code.google.com/p/mtcp/
. It gets updated more frequently than FreeDOS does, hence the spamming
the mailing list.
The next version so far has mostly IRCjr fixes and improvements. I'm
also looking into making it more
Does the SCSI card have an onboard BIOS? If so, it should provide BIOS
level access to hard drives using INT 13h. You should not need device
drivers to access that function.
Windows wants device drivers for additional device support and
performance. FreeDOS is just fine with BIOS level
, but often not productive. That is not a typical use-case for DOS.
Mike
On 11/13/2012 9:50 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 13, 2012 8:39 PM, Michael B. Brutman mbbrut...@brutman.com
mailto:mbbrut...@brutman.com wrote:
I think that 8GB is more than enough for any DOS system I'm ever going
We are far off topic now and I probably should not admit this but ...
I've installed both DOS 3.3 and DOS 5 on the same machine lately. And
yes, I had to use 32MB partitions.
I wanted to be able to dual boot my machine (a PCjr, 1983) to both
operating systems. DOS 3.3 uses an earlier
I noted that FDNPKG is using WatTCP - I don't see that as a problem.
While I prefer mTCP and I think it has many advantages (speed, size, bug
fixes, etc.) WatTCP works well enough and people are comfortable with
it. I also have a slight bias, so I am trying to be objective. ; - 0
The
John,
Just to make sure I understand ...
You are running a batch file that is doing net use to setup printer
shares, a file share, and loads nansi.sys. And the output to the screen
during that time is around 8.5 chars per second?
Just as a comparison, running the FreeDOS Beta of 1.1 under
John,
Maybe you could help us by being very specific with what worked and what
went wrong? The only thing I could gather from your message was that it
was difficult to do, and it was slow.
One thing that is essential for good performance is to ensure that your
host machine is new enough to
You sent your query to the freedos-user list. Are you subscribed to
freedos-devel too? If not, then you should.
Another great resource is the forums at BTTR software:
http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum.php
And one more link - the programming area of the Vintage-computer forum:
I'm missing something here.
The big restriction that a GPL license imposes is copyleft. If you use
GPL code *AND* you distribute your work then you have to make your
source code available too. You can profit from your work and the work
of others but you can't hide your changes.
In the case
Overly pedantic.
The thread title stopped matching the thread contents a few replies ago
- it has not discussed FreeDOS compatibility in the recent replies. It
has devolved into an open source licensing meta discussion. It is a
meta discussion by most reasonable measures, and I changed the
On 7/6/2012 12:25 PM, C. Masloch wrote:
I agree, I'm certainly overly pedantic and unreasonable and silly.
And you're the one using the term intellectual property as if that was a
coherent concept.
=)
I guess I don't understand that last message either. The purpose of all
of these
Hi David,
There are versions of DOS supplied with machines that have a mode
command that can redirect the printer port. It might even be a standard
feature of the mode command. But it is strictly a port change - instead
of using the BIOS to send characters to the printer it uses the BIOS to
I have been blissfully unaware of the packaging requirements for
FreeDOS. I update mTCP a few times a year, and I know that is a lot of
work to get right. Is there a FAQ or notes on how FreeDOS manages
packages? If I can make the mTCP updates easier I will.
Mike
On 6/22/2012 2:01 PM, Bob Tanner wrote:
Asking here as I cannot find any mailing list or new group for pythond.
Looking for a reason why pythond under FreeDOS does not support the
icmp protocol.
PythonD 2.4.2r1 for DJGPP [GCC 3.3.2] on ms-dos5
import socket
socket.getprotobyname(icmp)
Marcos,
As far as networking is concerned, I abuse my older machines all of
time. I don't think you have a networking problem; I think it is a
hardware problem, or very bad device driver settings.
General failure reading drive C is a bad sign. I would make a new
backup of that server hard
It has been a while and I've accumulated a lot of changes and fixes.
Here is what you can look forward to:
* Power awareness for virtual machines and laptops
*IRCjr fixes to improve compatibility with more servers
*Howto style documentation for setting up SLIP and PPP with mTCP
*FTPSrv
On 5/7/2012 6:32 PM, dmccunney wrote:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Michael B. Brutman
mbbrut...@brutman.com wrote:
Netcat is one of the best kept secrets in the world of networking. You
can use it to send email, printer files, or any arbitrary data from one
machine to another machine
If your network attached printer is listening on TCP/IP port 9100 (HP
JetDirect protocol) and your DOS program can generate something the
printer can understand, then do the following:
- Print your printer output to a file
- Send the file to the printer using this command:
nc -target
On 5/6/2012 4:10 PM, nospam wrote:
Very interesting. I suggest you make a FreeDOS Wiki page from this
information.
Georg
It is just a trick that I found. I was waiting to do a more
comprehensive writeup on network printing until after I write an LPR daemon.
Netcat is one of the best kept
On 4/26/2012 10:18 PM, jasse...@itelefonica.com.br wrote:
My wishes:
1) Support for class 6 packet drivers
2) TCP/IP packet logging capability
3) A TSR version
Best regards,
JAS
1) mTCP does not support serial (class 6) directly. But DOSPPP can be
used with mTCP and I have used one
On 4/21/2012 5:44 AM, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros wrote:
snip
Also, it would be nice if mTCP became FDAPM-aware.
Regards *and* thanks,
Marcos
Marcos,
I'm testing this now. With FDAPM set to APMDOS VirtualBox is idling.
Before I made the change it was chewing up an entire CPU.
I
Marcos,
A network drive letter similar to the Microsoft LAN client would be
great, but that is a major undertaking - far larger in effort than the
FTP server, which was the last major addition. That is not coming any
time soon - it might as well be a separate project for the amount of
work
I am looking for wish lists items, bug reports, and ideas for the next
release of mTCP.
The current version is about six months old now. I haven't had too many
bug reports so there has not been a great need to update it. That is
also the release that FreeDOS 1.1 chose to use, so it has seen
On 4/11/2012 5:21 AM, Alex wrote:
This is exactly the sort of nightmarish scenario I was worrying about!!
I was hoping that someone would point out how foolish my worries were,
but now they appear to be not so foolish after all...
As an end user, your fears are probably foolish. Emulation
On 4/11/2012 1:25 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Michael B. Brutman
mbbrut...@brutman.com wrote:
For hard-core application programming where you need to use a few BIOS
and DOS interrupts I like to use C and C++ (carefully). C gives you a
tremendous amount
On 4/11/2012 1:38 PM, John Wesley Cooper wrote:
On 4/11/2012 6:14 AM, Michael B. Brutman wrote:
As an end user, your fears are probably foolish. Emulation and
virtualization work fine
for anybody playing with DOS at the application level.
Application-level? But doesn't DOS more or less
On 4/11/2012 2:34 PM, Alex wrote:
Sorry but I still don't find the above comments very reassuring, with
regard to the future usability of (Free)DOS on new hardware. The fact
that we will be able to run DOS in emulators/virtual machines, because
we can no longer boot it, is no reason at all for
On 4/3/2012 1:18 AM, Michael Robinson wrote:
There is a syntax error message that flashes before the where to install
freedos to and from menu comes up. Another problem, install freezes at
installing command.com. Uge!
Are you installing on old hardware or in a virtual machine?
Some of us
On 4/8/2012 8:46 PM, Kenny Emond wrote:
Hey,
I was finnaly able to find a packet driver for my DOS computer
(ethernet connection), but for some reason Arachne shows the main
page, but when I try to go to a different page, it brings up
a roadrunner search thing. I tried to edit the
On 4/8/2012 10:00 PM, cordat...@aol.com wrote:
FreeDOS User ...
If WATTCP is working correctly you don't need the other lines in your
config file beyond my_ip=dhcp as they are filled in if DHCP works.
As has been discussed here before some versions of WATTCP support DHCP
and some don't.
For hard-core application programming where you need to use a few BIOS
and DOS interrupts I like to use C and C++ (carefully). C gives you a
tremendous amount of control and flexibility.
My two favorite compilers are:
Borland Turbo C++ 3.0 for DOS: I did most of my early mTCP work. It
On 2/13/2012 6:06 AM, kqt4a...@gmail.com wrote:
I am connected!!!
I used the Intel EtherExpress/16 packet driver from crynwr.com
Now, how do I go about getting apps to use dns and is there such a thing as a
host table
Richard
What are you using?
If it is mTCP there is a nameserver
On 2/12/2012 11:42 AM, kqt4a...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a different approach
I downloaded the latest iso, moved the Tandy harddrive to a pc, and installed
Now I have the Tandy up on FreeDOS
One itch to scratch is when I run dir I get Press any key to continue after
every single line
Next I
Bertho,
I spoke from the point of view of the device (the hard drive) - if the
hardware that the device is attached to chooses not to expose all of the
options that the device supports, there is little the device can do
about that. In the case of your external storage somebody made a design
The list membership is not that large. You can assume that people are
busy or don't know the answer.
As far as 4K blocks go, I wouldn't worry about it too much. 512 byte
sectors will be supported either natively or by emulation in the drive
itself for a long time to come - at least 5 to 10
Hi Eric,
I expect that in the next few years we'll see very large hard drives and
they will continue to support 512 byte sector sizes - that is what the
system manufacturers demand. The actual sector size of the drive might
be 4KB but the drive will allow the host to choose a 512 byte or 4KB
On 12/11/2011 11:55 PM, David Griffith wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Ralf A. Quint wrote:
At 09:36 PM 12/11/2011, Ralf A. Quint wrote:
How can I get this code to do the Right Thing?
Actually just realized that it's pretty easy, you just need to
typecast properly all parts of the makeid macro:
Rugxulo,
I could have looked up Z machine - was just pressed for time this
morning. I try not to sound willfully ignorant. ;-0
(Which reminds me - I wanted to do a telnet server that used the Zork
virtual machine as a proof of concept. Now I know where to go start
when I find the time. Zork
Hi Eric,
I don't have a lot of experience myself, but a lot of my fellow hackers
who specialize in obsolete machines have reported problems with CF
cards. While CF cards are supposed to emulate IDE devices, a lot of the
newer ones do not support CHS addressing and do not work in older
Andrew,
You should look for a product called Disk On Module. They are
composed of FLASH chips and are designed to be direct replacements for
IDE hard drives. Unlike a lot of CF cards that can be used with an CF
to IDE adapter but might not support CHS addressing, DOMs are designed
as IDE
On 10/25/2011 4:25 PM, Koh Choon Lin wrote:
Does that means FreeDOS would not be able to support multiplayer
network DOS games like Doom, CC, etc.. which MSDOS is able to do so
with ethernet?
For most of your questions, FreeDOS is equivalent to PC DOS or MS DOS.
So however you use those,
Jack,
[1] Not everybody on the list is a native English speaker.
[2] You need to calm down. The tone of many of your postings is
borderline hostile.
-Mike
--
The demand for IT networking professionals continues
On 10/18/2011 4:50 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
Well I finally did it. Took a few hours, and I really didn't know Pat
well enough (online) to do him justice, but I sure tried very very
hard.
Well done. I've noticed that the FreeDOS page at Wikipedia has been
updated quite a bit recently too - it was
On 10/13/2011 9:18 PM, Ralf A. Quint wrote:
At 03:02 PM 10/13/2011, Eduardo Casino wrote:
2011/10/10 Ralf A. Quintfree...@gmx.net:
At 01:38 PM 10/9/2011, Eduardo Casino wrote:
Would you be so kind of testing it in one of your 286? It should fail
with ERROR: Not running on top of VMWARE.
Excellent, and you are welcome! I am glad it is working this time
around - I get embarrassed when I let broken code out. Some questions:
For best performance the following should be set in the mTCP config file:
MTU 1500
FTPSRV_FILEBUFFER_SIZE 16
FTPSRV_TCPBUFFER_SIZE 16
On 10/5/2011 7:27 PM, Alain Mouette wrote:
I had problems with networking in dos for a few users, a short time ago.
After a lot of headache, I discovered that those were conections via
ADSL that used PPPoE, which has a 28 bytes overhead.
So now I use
MTU=1472
and I had no more problems
Sorry everybody .. the FTP Server was tragically broken under FreeDOS.
I have coded a workaround for some bad drive detection code that I put
in and uploaded a new release of mTCP.
Thanks go to Ulrich, Eric and Ralf for reporting the problem and helping
me debug it.
(I don't fully
On 10/1/2011 11:09 AM, Jim Hall wrote:
I uploaded my file successfully, but wasn't able to complete my download:
Jim,
Please try it again - we have a common enemy, and it is my ISP.
I've tested this with files as large as 170MB under DOS 5. I'm sure it
will work if the connection stays up.
You've probably seen enough chatter already, so I'll keep this brief.
The FTP server testing is done, and I've released a new version of
mTCP. Most of the changes were improvements to the FTP server. IRCjr
now allows the user to edit their input before sending it, and the
default transfer
at 08:37 -0500, Michael B. Brutman wrote:
I have made a large round of improvements to the FTP server in mTCP and
I am looking for a little testing help with it. If you have a few spare
moments over the next day or two just try to connect to it and browse
the file structure. Using a few
On 9/21/2011 9:48 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
Why not imitate DJGPP instead? It's probably more familiar to people,
e.g. /dev/c/ or /dev/d/ or whatever. Or use both (or not,
whatever). ;-)
I was given good advice to shorten it, so it might not be in the form of
/drive_x/ but something more like just
The current DOS path handling in the FTP server is kind of broken - it
works for some clients, but not for others. Ironically, the smarter the
FTP client the less likely it is to work.
The problem has to do with exposing drive letters in the path.
Filezilla in particular detects the drive
On 9/14/2011 6:14 AM, Zbigniew wrote:
Most probably you can run on your multicore machine concurrent
sessions of DOSBOX (or DOSEMU).
modern hardware can emulate older hardware. Now you have
a clean means of supporting modern hardware for people using old DOS
applications. Want your multi
Here is the link to the announcement:
http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=10488
To me this is a serious problem - losing a piece of the DOS community is
bad. Losing the place where a lot of the programmers hang out is even
worse.
Mike
On 9/13/2011 7:10 PM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
Look at it this way, it is extremely hard to support modern hardware in
a DOS style environment because DOS allowed application programs to use
hardware directly. Jim Hall has said himself that he has limited
interest in the GUI end and most
Alerting us to the clashes in ReactOS serves to remind us of how good we
have it here; the group is small and flare-ups are at a minimum.
That being said, I don't think it is productive to keep making your case
here; it is not a FreeDOS issue and it is not for us to judge who is
right or
On 8/30/2011 1:46 AM, escape wrote:
Great to hear, as mTCP becoming all-you-need-for-dos-networking
solution. BTW what do you think about how hard it wiil be to implement
DOS-based rsync server, even if feature-limited?
I started looking at the rsync client - getting past the compiler and
On 8/25/2011 6:20 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:48 PM, escapeesc...@front.ru wrote:
If you use dos alone and purely on your machine, but nevertheless have
some *nix server access you can use rsync client for dos:
http://www.2net.co.uk/rsync.html
Good, GPL. Interesting,
The next mTCP is available, with HTGet now included:
http://code.google.com/p/mtcp/
There are two versions of the pre-compiled binaries to choose from -
standard and -upx. The -upx version binaries are compressed with a
program called UPX that decompresses the programs at load time. You will
On 7/26/2011 12:09 PM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
snip
HTGET supporting common HTTP URL/URI syntax
(http://server.domain.extension/path/file.ext) is good enough already.
your -userpass seems to indicate no complete syntax is possible, and
portnumbers either assumed 80 or not changeable.
I have an early version of HTGet ready that I would like to get some
more testing on before it becomes part of mTCP. It is available here:
http://www.brutman.com/mTCP/htget.zip
HTGet lets you download a file (or whatever content) from an HTTP
server. Just put the URL on the command
On 7/25/2011 6:52 PM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
Thanks for creating this. It means you're pretty close to a basic WGET,
and also reminds me why I never liked HTGET: no support for FTP and
REDIRECT/MOVED. URL parsing seems fine. Not sure if/how HTGET would
respond to HTTPS://
Example URL
On 7/25/2011 7:46 PM, Mike Eriksen wrote:
Maybe a stupid idea, but couldn't HTGet just call you FTP client in
case of a FTP-URL and let that one handle the download and keep the
rest inside HTGet?
Mike
There is no simple call ... the FTP client is a stand-alone program.
In the event of a
On 6/22/2011 10:49 PM, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros wrote:
Hi Mike,
I shouldn't even have called this thing a bug. It is, at most, an
issue of semantics. Because the SNTC screen message used the word
timezone, I thought it would write UTC+3.
I'm probably right on that point (just
On 6/22/2011 8:10 PM, Mike Eriksen wrote:
If SNTP works anyway like in Linux/UNIX then the computer takes its
hardware clock as UTC. If the hardware clock is offset to local time
it will be misinterpreted. The poor computer doesn't have any
conception of UTC by itself, it only knows its
On 6/22/2011 9:15 AM, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for mTCP!
I experimented with it yesterday for the first time, and it took
me just 15 minutes to get started, in spite of my near complete
lack of internet experience (except of course web browsers and
email
On 6/2/2011 1:42 AM, Willi Wasser wrote:
Some developers may not be too happy
about the license choice, especially
those who would like to grab your code
and try to make money from it by making
it part of an unfree software.
Let's be serious! Is there still a market for any kind of DOS out
On 6/1/2011 5:30 PM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
Actually this is not really news but just a wish from my side. The
discussion what*s part of FreeDOS 1.1 takes place since some time at
freedos-devel. I think the developers decide, while we users should
publish our expectations and wishes.
So I
On 5/28/2011 3:57 AM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
hi Michael, congratulations on possibly having the first GPL3 DOS program ^^
I seem to recall you needing permission from your employer to do this so
thanks go out to them as well.
I think that honor was claimed already. I solved the permission
I released mTCP as open source today: http://code.google.com/p/mtcp/
Enjoy!
Mike
--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you
Come and get it! http://www.brutman.com/mTCP/
In this version:
- CTCP support in IRCjr (you can do /me now!)
- DHCP client enhanced to do multiple retries and give better error messages
- Fixed a parsing error in the FTP server
- Telnet can now work with servers that do not accurately interpret
On 4/10/2011 11:35 PM, Jack wrote:
Also, I do not know you and you do not know me, so WHO ARE YOU to assume
I am irritated or in a bad mood?!! Are you in fact a COMMUNIST?? I
seem to recall THEY used to operate via trying to beat-DOWN opposition
with such unqualified INSULTS as you have
On 4/10/2011 5:20 AM, escape wrote:
Vote with your wallet. I'm personally not buying any 4k drives nor for
myself nor for companies I'm working for. When you need more than 2Tb of
space you always can add another 2Tb drive instead of replacing old
drive with bigger (3Tb) one.
I think that is
On 4/10/2011 12:08 PM, escape wrote:
Please get it right. I'm not arguing against support of new
technologies. But now it's often when manufacturers trying to disguise
cost cutting and marketing rubbish as prominent new technology.
Look at monitors as an example. Getting 16:10 aspect along
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
