On 25/09/2023 11:20, Jürgen Wondzinski via Freedos-user wrote:
Thanks for the pointer! Unfortunately, that one wants some DPMI memory:
"Load error: no DPMI - Get csdpmi*b.zip"
That's my current config.sys part on that USB-Sticks, which run that FoxPro
program:
device=c:\freedos\jemmEx.exe
eusz Viste
Betreff: Re: [Freedos-user] ChkDsk / ScanDsk for Fat32
On 15/09/2023 19:42, Jürgen Wondzinski via Freedos-user wrote:
> Is there a ChkDsk or ScanDsk etc available for FAT32?
> The usual chkdsk92.exe doesn't support this.
You might want to try D
On 15/09/2023 19:42, Jürgen Wondzinski via Freedos-user wrote:
Is there a ChkDsk or ScanDsk etc available for FAT32?
The usual chkdsk92.exe doesn't support this.
You might want to try DOSFSCK.
Mateusz
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Hi all,
I'm supporting an old FoxPro/DOS app, which is running on a USB-Stick.
The customer now has bought new sticks, which are 16Gb and
Rufus insists of formatting them with FAT32.
Is there a ChkDsk or ScanDsk etc available for FAT32?
The usual chkdsk92.exe doesn't support this.
Thanks for
Hi!
> You must put a ":" when specifying a drive.
So has that solved your problem? I guess without ":"
our chkdsk might have tried to open a disk image file
with file name "c" and used a misleading error message?
I admit I have not read the chkdsk data, just intuition.
Regards, Eric
>> I am
Granted others may have helped, but I simply want to make sure you are
using a freedos tool on a drive that is running freedos?
meaning that drive was formatted with freedos, not ms dos?
If not one reason for the error is that you should not use chkdsk from
one edition of dos on another.
You must put a ":" when specifying a drive.
On 8/17/20 10:53 AM, jamie marchant wrote:
Hi
I am trying to fix some error on my disk with the FreeDos "check
disk"(chkdsk) and gives the "Error accessing the volume", this is with
the "/F" flag and booted through MS-DOS. Why might I have this
Hi
I am trying to fix some error on my disk with the FreeDos "check
disk"(chkdsk) and gives the "Error accessing the volume", this is with
the "/F" flag and booted through MS-DOS. Why might I have this error?
Did you want to see a photo of the output above this?
--
-Jamie Marchant
I am sorry!! i am just being a lazy bakapee!!
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/chkdsk-for-fat32-tp20403p24299.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Hey will the chkdsk for fat32 ever be made? ^^;
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/chkdsk-for-fat32-tp20403p24287.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hey skarky4 if you answer to a message could you than please answer it
that way it gets associate with the previews message and not as a new
conversation? thanks, possible your "nabble", whatever that may be,
isn't capable of handling mailing-lists the correct way...
regards
Hi Sparky,
> Hey will the chkdsk for fat32 ever be made? ^^;
It already exists as (a bit old) dosfstools port:
http://www.freedos.org/software/?prog=dosfsck
If you want dosfsck to either "look like chkdsk"
or "work on 8086 and 80286" then please have a
look at earlier threads about the issue:
Is there a repository for eight bit DOS and utilities?
On Sat, 4/19/14, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com wrote:
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] chkdsk for fat32!
To: Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS.
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
I still have my dos lib collection from the bbs days still online
http://digitalatoll.com/pub/DOSLIB/
--
-chris
Computer Consultant Repair Tech
Digitalatoll Solutions Group
Tawhaki Software
http://digitalatoll.com/
http://tawakisoft.com/
Cell: 916-612-6904
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 12:04 PM,
Chris,
very fine assortment here. May I share this link in a few places?
You might be surprised how many bbs structures still exist, and there is of
course still good old fashioned telnet.
www.telnet.org
thanks,
Karen
On Sun, 20 Apr 2014, Chris Evans wrote:
I still have my dos lib collection
wait, this must be an only freedos issue? All of my large drives in dos
use fat 32, and I have functional chkdsk.
Kare
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014, sparky4 wrote:
Why dosn't chkdsk support fat 32 yet? i have an IBM XT that had FAT32
DRIVES AND i cannot check them for errors i have to pull it out
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Karen Lewellen
klewel...@shellworld.net wrote:
wait, this must be an only freedos issue? All of my large drives in dos
use fat 32, and I have functional chkdsk.
Where does your functional CHKDSK come from?
I have FreeDOS multibooting on a box with Win2K and
I am running ms dos 7.1 ish, an augmented package which includes chkdsk
and some other extra utilities.
I am not running freedos at all, which is why i hinted it must be a
problem specific to freedos, not to Dos itself.
Kare
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014, dmccunney wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at
Hi! Note that this thread is about a PC-XT computer:
In FreeDOS, only the 32-bit DOSFSCK supports FAT32.
Our 16-bit CHKDSK does not. Yet only CHKDSK can run
on the old PC-XT, which interestingly has an ISA IDE
harddisk controller with LBA capable BIOS on it :-)
The FAT32-enabled CHKDSK of Win9x
why? worked fine on the 486 I use to have. Gosh I have been running
this package on my machines for years.
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014, Eric Auer wrote:
Hi! Note that this thread is about a PC-XT computer:
In FreeDOS, only the 32-bit DOSFSCK supports FAT32.
Our 16-bit CHKDSK does not. Yet only
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Karen Lewellen
klewel...@shellworld.net wrote:
why? worked fine on the 486 I use to have. Gosh I have been running
this package on my machines for years.
Er, 486 != XT hardware.
I still have my original XT sitting on a shelf. It has a replacement
motherboard
On 2014-04-19 13:01 (GMT-0400) dmccunney composed:
Er, 486 != XT hardware.
I still have my original XT sitting on a shelf. It has a replacement
motherboard with a 10 *mhz* NEC V20 CPU, a Hercules graphics card, and
two Seagate ST-225 20 *MB* MFM hard drives connected to an add-on
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2014-04-19 13:01 (GMT-0400) dmccunney composed:
Er, 486 != XT hardware.
I still have my original XT sitting on a shelf. It has a replacement
motherboard with a 10 *mhz* NEC V20 CPU, a Hercules graphics card, and
Why dosn't chkdsk support fat 32 yet? i have an IBM XT that had FAT32
DRIVES AND i cannot check them for errors i have to pull it out and
check them on my newer machines !
--
with love,
sparky4
Administrator of 四葉の芽◇ちゃんねる
Hi Sparky,
Why dosn't chkdsk support fat 32 yet? i have an IBM XT that had FAT32
DRIVES AND i cannot check them for errors i have to pull it out and
check them on my newer machines !
Because chkdsk aims to be very much like the DOS version,
so it has to run with very little RAM and 16 bit
Hi Ray,
This is CHKDSK beta 0.9.1
If there is a sub-directory present on a floppy, CHKDSK report seems
normal. If there is no sub-directory - whether or not there are files:
Assertion failed: size, file bitfield.c, line 34
Abnormal program termination
Is this to be expected?
No. I
This is CHKDSK beta 0.9.1
If there is a sub-directory present on a floppy, CHKDSK report seems
normal. If there is no sub-directory - whether or not there are files:
Assertion failed: size, file bitfield.c, line 34
Abnormal program termination
Is this to be expected?
ChkDsk beta 0.9.2
Hi,
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros
fav...@mpcnet.com.br wrote:
This is CHKDSK beta 0.9.1
If there is a sub-directory present on a floppy, CHKDSK report seems
normal. If there is no sub-directory - whether or not there are files:
Assertion failed: size,
This is CHKDSK beta 0.9.1
If there is a sub-directory present on a floppy, CHKDSK report seems
normal. If there is no sub-directory - whether or not there are files:
Assertion failed: size, file bitfield.c, line 34
Abnormal program termination
Is this to be expected?
Ray
When I run chkdsk it reports many problems:
ChkDsk beta 0.9
Copyright 2002, 2003 Imre Leber under the GNU GPL
\KERNEL.SYS has an invalid size, the size should be about 4294901760, but
the entry says it's 45341
\COMMAND.COM has an invalid size, the size should be about 4294868992, but
Hi Blair, Christian,
IIRC chkdsk does not support FAT32 filesystems. This might be your issue.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Christian Groessler fdos...@yahoo.de wrote:
When I run dosfsck c: it reports everything ok:
dosfsck 2.11.DOS, 15 Apr 2006, FAT32, LFN
c:: 4191 files, 6623/62597
--- Blair Campbell blaird...@gmail.com schrieb am Fr, 3.4.2009:
IIRC chkdsk does not support FAT32 filesystems. This might
be your issue.
No, it's a FAT16 filesystem. When I boot MS-DOS 6.22 from CD it
can read it fine and its chkdsk doesn't report any problems.
chris
Hi,
I'm using FreeDOS 1.0.
When I run dosfsck c: it reports everything ok:
dosfsck 2.11.DOS, 15 Apr 2006, FAT32, LFN
c:: 4191 files, 6623/62597 clusters
When I run chkdsk it reports many problems:
ChkDsk beta 0.9
Copyright 2002, 2003 Imre Leber under the GNU GPL
\KERNEL.SYS has an invalid
Norton Disk Doctor from W2K says C: is OK.
FreeDOS chkdsk c: produces a 40K file. All entries are: file has an
invalid size.
The only chkdsk bug I find is 1954.
The problem stated in 1954 does not appear here.
Ray
-
Hi Ray,
Norton Disk Doctor from W2K says C: is OK.
FreeDOS chkdsk c: produces a 40K file. All entries are:
file has an invalid size.
The only chkdsk bug I find is 1954.
The problem stated in 1954 does not appear here.
Let me guess: The size is exactly 4 gb minus the actual
size of the
The file I had was: 3 July 06 35380
File produced: 40290
The new file is: 3 July 06 92376
File produced: 40382
Same complaints. Here is a sample.
\KERNEL.SYS has an invalid size, the size should be about 4294901760,
but the entry says it's 45341
Ray
Ray Davison wrote:
The file I had was: 3 July 06 35380
File produced: 40290
The new file is: 3 July 06 92376
File produced: 40382
Same complaints. Here is a sample.
\KERNEL.SYS has an invalid size, the size should be about 4294901760,
but the entry says it's 45341
Both versions work OK
Ray Davison wrote:
chkdsk beta 0.9.1 works on A, C and D - the only FAT16 on this machine.
Ray
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
Hello.
chkdsk reports wrong file size. Is it known bug?
\FDOS\VIM\VIM70\SPELL\EN_UTF-8.SPL has an invalid size, the size should be
about 4294377472, but the entry says it's 570548
\FDOS\VIM\VIM70\SPELL\EN_UTF-8.SUG has an invalid size, the size should be
about 4294410240, but the entry says
39 matches
Mail list logo
