On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 21:36 +0800, Johnson Lam wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:24:06 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Robert,
You forget to mention F-Prot's resident shield or reliability. ClamAV is
far from perfect and so it is NOT a replacement for F-Prot.
Oh! I forgot, thanks for reminding me,
Johnson Lam wrote:
Clam have no official for DOS (DOS version port by Blair Campbell,
have some minor problems), and without a nice UI like F-PROT.
You forget to mention F-Prot's resident shield or reliability. ClamAV is
far from perfect and so it is NOT a replacement for F-Prot.
Robert
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:24:06 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Robert,
You forget to mention F-Prot's resident shield or reliability. ClamAV is
far from perfect and so it is NOT a replacement for F-Prot.
Oh! I forgot, thanks for reminding me, it's been a long time.
I use F-PROT because SCAN become slow
