> I had observed a problem with the Subst in the FreeDOS, but as not had
> observed in the MSDOS, did not comment.
> If to use subst physically using an existing letter of drive (or
> partition), is not possible to work correctly.
> It would be a Bug, really?
>
> Roma
>
I did a little bit more
Hi Bernd:
Thanks for the reply.
This has been fun. :-)
Mark
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> >
> Yes, sorry. Alternatives are welcome, but I need to guarantee that a
> bootsector is written in order to get a bootable system.
Yes, you do need to write a boot sector. How about the
following
Hi!
The new Pc-Welt is shipped with a bootable CD-ROM - an emergency CD!
You can boot FreeDOS beta 9, and other utilities from it. Also NTFSDOS
is included!!!
I think, this is a very good news!
Bye, Flo
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: In
Hi Bernd:
Oh, I forgot to mention that the "SYS" command takes care of copying
kernel.sys and command.com. Basically, if I copy the ODIN directory
into something sensible and do a few tweaks of autoexec.bat and
config.sys, then the USB stick boots and provides a good
FreeDOS environment.
My reas
Hi,
> Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Installing FreeDOS on E:?
> If you want a copy of the detailed installation for MS-DOS (which
> requires manually copying files to the USB stick), let me know. I
> hope to have it updated for FreeDOS soon.
would be nice, yes, can you upload it yourself by copy
I noticed another behavior difference between DRDOS and FreeDOS:
If,in a batchfile there is the line:
IF %1==XYZ GOTO LABEL
and no argument is passed in command line when calling the batch file,
Then DRDOS acts as if the comparison failed (that is,does not goto LABEL
with above line,but goto LAB
Jose Antonio Senna wrote:
I noticed another behavior difference between DRDOS and FreeDOS:
If,in a batchfile there is the line:
IF %1==XYZ GOTO LABEL
and no argument is passed in command line when calling the batch file,
Then DRDOS acts as if the comparison failed (that is,does not goto LABEL
wi
