At 01:43 PM 4/19/2006 +0800, Johnson Lam wrote:
Forward an email from Jack, hoping everyone can understand what's
going on, I'd like the others to understand the whole thing, not out
of context:
snipped
It is a flame, as you well know, but it seems you have become immune to any
sense of
coralline algae wrote:
At that point the vendor said oh sorry you need to buy one of our pc's
as we only support spp mode and we can supply that pc hardware.
SPP stands for 'Standard Parallel Port'. But the PS/2 bidirectional port
is a standard port with input mode capability, enabled via bit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
What a load of nonsense this is.
Johnson Lam wrote:
Forward an email from Jack, hoping everyone can understand what's
going on, I'd like the others to understand the whole thing, not out
of context:
That was not a particularly useful thing to
Hi all,
Shane is right. As is Jim. You cannot remove GPL from a software.
So you cannot force us to delete XCDROM and XDMA. And, why should
we? They are good software and you do not allow us to use the
better QCDROM and QDMA instead. You can do the latter, because as
the author, you can release a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi everyone
The FreeDOS Beta9sr2 distribution has some errors with the installer,
and needs to be replaced. I'm having a look at the CD ISO and the
floppy image this week.
Does anyone have a neat list of what updated files could go into a new
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:29:40 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
What a load of nonsense this is.
If you talk about the GPL, there're misunderstanding here.
That was not a particularly useful thing to do Johnson.
I think you missed some scene here, so I don't want to talk about the
personal matter between
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:57:36 +0300, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
Do you see now why I retired from the FreeDOS development?
Yes, sadly.
I view of all latest events I must say that however I admire Jack's
work, Shane, Eric and Jim are right. It was me who sent the deleted
XDMA to Jim to add to his
Hi Johnson,
1) Jack don't want to let people think his work is a part of
FreeDOS, he didn't ask ALL the people to remove the XDMA source, just
don't want it on FreeDOS server
Fewer people will use XDMA when it is no longer included with FreeDOS.
2) He didn't limit anyone to use the XDMA
I'd originally posted, asking if FreeDOS is right for my application.
Since I've joined the list, I've had one or two people suggest other
operating systems, and a bunch of people bickering of the ownership of
some wretched piece of software. No one has stepped up and suggested that
FreeDOS is
# On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:25:05 -0400, Scott Mayo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
# Since I've joined the list, I've had one or two people suggest other
# operating systems, and a bunch of people bickering of the ownership of
# some wretched piece of software. No one has stepped up and suggested
10 matches
Mail list logo
