you can use this in conjunction ox HX extender (www.japheth.de)
http://www.advsys.net/ken/util/kpic.exe
Ken's PICture viewer. Supports: JPG,PNG,GIF,TGA,PCX,BMP. View all files in a
directory or files inside a .ZIP. (no need to extract first!) Example: kpic
/zduke3d_hrp.zip *.png *.jpg. Select
It must be supported by your BIOS.
From cca 6 PC's I could test within last 2 years 1 tries but fails and
the remaining 5 don't even try. So ...
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
uses much memory and is very slow (45s just to load on my computer).
DPMI host ??? Some faulty EMM386 ???
For me it isn't slow at all :-) ... I didn't test the memory requirements :-|
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
Crystal
would be useful as fallback to have at least SOME access to your non-BIOS
disks
Why not the fastest SATA AHCI DMA ? Apparently the problem is not
inside UIDE ;-)
Adding block-device support would take a LOT more code and isn't
really necessary. There are two other schemes that can be used
Hi!
would be useful as fallback to have at least SOME access to your non-BIOS
disks
Why not the fastest SATA AHCI DMA ? Apparently the problem is not
inside UIDE ;-)
If your motorbike fails, the fallback is not a plane. It is a bicycle.
In other words, if for example a CF card only
What are you talking about? ReactOS is not about Windows Me
The request of M.R. (NO, I don't understand it well ... or at all)
Yes, it seems you don't understand it, or at least not the same way I do.
I don't see where he mentioned Windows Me at all.
And Windows 3.x/9x is no DOS GUI from
Adding block-device support would take a LOT more code
A ramdisk is often a tiny driver. To give block device access
to UIDE disks,
Okay..
you only need a partition table parser
Yes, which would reside in the temporary (discarded) part of the driver.
Of course that won't decrease it's
This is off-topic and irrelevant anyway ...
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the
If your motorbike fails, the fallback is not a plane. It is a bicycle.
Or just your feet ...
In other words, if for example a CF card only supports PIO,
neither UDMA nor AHCI DMA will help you
OK ... do the SATA PCI addon cards suport PIO also ?
I see no arguments against supporting PIO
DOS386 wrote:
I haven't asked for adding block-device to UIDE, just
non-BIOS disks support, and I don't need it too _badly_
since I have none by now.
Non-BIOS disk support for caching already exists in UIDE,
in its external entry logic which can be conditionally-
assembled into the driver.
I am also very glad for the new kernel. I am waiting for the 1.1 version
impatiently.
I have made a FreeDOS distro of my own. Philosoficaly it is an installer
radicaly oposed to FreeDOS's. My intention was to get close to the
original DOS installer, wich is... nothing :) ... I just added a
Well I finally found a ESS PCI card here:
http://www.recycledgoods.com/item/32052.aspx
Anyone have this card and if so have you already tested this on a modern
motherboard without ISA slots?
I planned on getting it but I want to check and see if someone tried this
with FreeDOS and a modern
dos386 wrote:
It must be supported by your BIOS.
From cca 6 PC's I could test within last 2 years 1 tries but fails and
the remaining 5 don't even try. So ...
... you did something wrong. From hundreds of PCs only a few failed here.
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
Michael Robinson schreef:
There are many Windows programs that only work in
dos based Windows. There is such a thing as a dos
based Windows program, try to run it at the dos
prompt ( any version ) and you'll get a this
requires Microsoft Windows error. Many of these
same programs either
Just wondering what Open Source libraries in the graphics/multimedia/audio
areas anyone's had any luck getting to build and work with on FreeDOS?
I read programs with SDL library work in some cases with HX Extender. Am
assuming SDL doesn't build on its own in djgpp or a similar C/C++ compiler
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
Michael Robinson schreef:
There are many Windows programs that only work in
dos based Windows. There is such a thing as a dos
based Windows program, try to run it at the dos
prompt ( any version ) and you'll get a this
Eric Auer wrote:
as your driver already has built-in caching, UIDE does
not need to make int 13 device numbers for non-BIOS
devices ...
I assume you mean its ability to cache devices other than
its own SATA/IDE devices, by using UIDE's external call
routines, and I agree with you. A
17 matches
Mail list logo