Here is the link to the announcement:
http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=10488
To me this is a serious problem - losing a piece of the DOS community is
bad. Losing the place where a lot of the programmers hang out is even
worse.
Mike
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 19:00 -0500, Michael B. Brutman wrote:
Here is the link to the announcement:
http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=10488
To me this is a serious problem - losing a piece of the DOS community is
bad. Losing the place where a lot of the programmers
2011/9/14, Michael C. Robinson plu...@robinson-west.com:
[..] I'd say that Freedos has it's
uses, but without active development on a variant that can take
advantage of multiple cores and modern hardware, there are probably a
dwindling number of uses for it. Without hardware protection and
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 01:00 +, Zbigniew wrote:
2011/9/14, Michael C. Robinson plu...@robinson-west.com:
[..] I'd say that Freedos has it's
uses, but without active development on a variant that can take
advantage of multiple cores and modern hardware, there are probably a
dwindling
On 9/13/2011 7:10 PM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
Look at it this way, it is extremely hard to support modern hardware in
a DOS style environment because DOS allowed application programs to use
hardware directly. Jim Hall has said himself that he has limited
interest in the GUI end and most
Would be great to keep the forum archive, at least for read-only so
people ca nsearch answers to old questions, this is an important
knowledge base.
El 13/09/2011 07:30 p.m., Michael B. Brutman escribió:
Here is the link to the announcement:
I emailed Robert off-list to see if I might move it to freedos.org. I'd like
to see his forum continue in some way.
On Sep 13, 2011 9:53 PM, Marco Achury marcoach...@gmail.com wrote:
Would be great to keep the forum archive, at least for read-only so people
ca nsearch answers to old questions,
