RE: [Freedos-user] Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-22 Thread ileber
Hi, I noticed you added /s for move on the post version 1 list. I thought that that was working. Is there something that i should know about? Or are you refering to my bug report, it is indead not very clear. It was in regards to the .. entry bug where it should not use rename() function to rena

Re: [Freedos-user] Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Aitor Santamaría Merino schreef: Hi, This mail explains my position on the recent 1.0 list issue. If the FreeDOS version 1.0 concerns you, please read this. Aitor, mails are always welcome, I usually receive 10-50 mails a day, so yours is also welcome, weekly. It's just that I cannot promise to u

Re: [Freedos-user] Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, This mail explains my position on the recent 1.0 list issue. If the FreeDOS version 1.0 concerns you, please read this. When I declared my intention to create the TODO list, I explained my two major concerns about it. First of all is that I wanted it as a checklist, and second, that I just

Re: [Freedos-user] Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Jim Hall
Jim Hall wrote: Okay, I'm starting to get fed up with this kind of behavior. Eric sent an email to me & Aitor 07/19/2004 04:21 PM asking where he can upload some changes for the To-Do list, and asking about the changes he already submitted to the To-Do list, saying "... Or are there other reas

RES: [Freedos-user] Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Carlos AB
Only one question I forgot: Freedos will do separated distros for each country/language in the end, or just one big distro for all countries/languages? Carlos --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise

Re: [Freedos-user] Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Jim Hall
Okay, I'm starting to get fed up with this kind of behavior. Eric sent an email to me & Aitor 07/19/2004 04:21 PM asking where he can upload some changes for the To-Do list, and asking about the changes he already submitted to the To-Do list, saying "... Or are there other reasons apart from

Re: [Freedos-user] Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Eric Auer escribió: Hi, I am proud to have finished the first version of my inofficial FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list on: Eric, so why you ask in private? Can you please assume that the rest of us can be busy and maybe cannot reply on the fly? THANKS Regarding the list itself it looks very well (too ve

Re: [Freedos-user] Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Steffen Kaiser
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Eric Auer wrote: Hello Eric, KEYB and MODE/DISPLAY are intentionally left out, and VERIFY is actually a FreeCOM-internal command now. MKEYB is the unlucky It might be good to keep those programs around, say like DOS 6's forth floppy (was it named "SUPPLEMENT DISK"??) containin

[Freedos-user] Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-19 Thread Eric Auer
Hi, I am proud to have finished the first version of my inofficial FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list on: http://www.coli.uni-sb.de/~eric/stuff/soft/specials/freedos-inofficial-1.0-todo-list.html Features: - post 1.0 items are included and marked in a separate color (all link to http://www.freedos.org/news