Hi Mateusz,
In FreeDOS 1.0, most packages were in the same directory
structure of the same main FreeDOS directory. I do like
that approach. Note that it was not extreme in that: For
example Arachne, FBC, Emacs, GS, Lynx OpenXP, Pacific C,
Pegasus Mail and Setedit all had their own directories,
Hi!
Long time no see. I’d like to mention my POV anyways.
Why use a Unix-like structure?
In DOS, everything is where you want to put it.
Configuration files traditionally reside in the same directory where the actual
program that uses it is located. If not, it has its own structure (like
Hi guys,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:19 PM, userbeit...@abwesend.de wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Mateusz Viste mateusz@viste- family.net wrote:
Another question: how are you storing your files on your
FreeDOS systems? As far as I'm concerned, I usually store
games in a separate
part of the beauty of FreeDOS is that it's so versatile, so good,
thatyou can do stuff your own way with it - this, i think, is
not going to change, and i, for one, am all for it.
eufdp...@yahoo.com
eufdp...@yahoo.com
eufdp...@yahoo.com
Hi there!
I've discussed this topic with Jim out of the list, and decided to bring
it onlist, as it has no real 'ultimate answer', and requires to know
'how people store their stuff on FreeDOS'.
Now, what is it about:
FreeDOS packages are/were used primarily to package the FreeDOS system.
The
Mateusz Viste on 27 Sep 2012 08:16:47 +0200:
Another question: how are you storing your files on your FreeDOS
systems? As far as I'm concerned, I usually store games in a separate
directory, and other stuff under a 'programs' directory. But maybe other
categories would be needed? (like
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste-family.net wrote:
Another question: how are you storing your files on your FreeDOS
systems? As far as I'm concerned, I usually store games in a separate
directory, and other stuff under a 'programs' directory. But maybe other
Hello,
Marcos, Dennis - thanks for your valuable input. I see with only two
answers that we already have two very different point of view (Marcos
using a more 'classic' DOS-ish directory structure, while Dennis prefer
to unixify his environnement).
This makes me think that we definitely must
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste-family.net wrote:
Marcos, Dennis - thanks for your valuable input. I see with only two
answers that we already have two very different point of view (Marcos
using a more 'classic' DOS-ish directory structure, while Dennis prefer
to
On 09/27/2012 10:50 PM, dmccunney wrote:
Every user will have a preferred organization. One size will not fit all.
Yes indeed. That's why I believe the way to go will be using so,e env
variables to store installation paths to software (dosdir, gamesdir,
appsdir, develdir for starters, other
10 matches
Mail list logo