Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout comments

2010-05-22 Thread Liam Proven
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:38 AM, jasse...@itelefonica.com.br
jasse...@itelefonica.com.br wrote:
 Recently posted in this list:

(Alain Mouette)
No it has never been illegal, and it always worked
just fine. I use these since forever... what happened
is that most tools did not have a way of making them,
but if you know how to make them it allways worked
since MSDOS-3.

(Liam Proven)
 You have been lucky. I have seen many incorrectly-
partitioned systems with multiple primaries where
some drives were not visible, on various versions
of MS-DOS and up to Windows 95.

(Alain Mouette)
Not Lucky, just hard work. Partitions were invented
without extended partitions, so it worked from the
first...
FYI: I started using PC-DOS 1.1... so I have a long
history of dos and don'ts...

  I do not have as long experience as either of you, but
 at least MSDOS 5.0 and PCDOS 6.3 (copies which I keep
 now, in original floppies) look for just one DOS primary
 and one DOS extended partition in each partition table.
 If there are more than one, the others are ignored.

That is as I have observed, yes.

 DRDOS and FreeDOS search all the partition table.

Sounds about right.

  AFAIK, DOS partitions were invented in MSDOS 3.3, to
 work around the 32 MB disk size limit, and from the
 beginning they had the primary/extended options.

The history was this, as far as I know:

MS-DOS 2, 1st version with hard disk support; 1 × FAT12 32MB partition

MS-DOS 3.0, 1 × FAT16 primary + 1 × extended partition with 1 logical
drive, 2 × 32MB partitions, total 64MB

MS-DOS 3.3, 1 × FAT16 primary + 1 × extended partition with up to 23
logical drives, total of 24 × 32MB partitions, total 768MB

Compaq MS-DOS 3.31, large FAT32 partitions with up to 32 sectors per
cluster for partitions up to 2GB

IBM PC-DOS 4.0 adopted the Compaq scheme and MS followed suit. (DR-DOS
3.4, the first version, was just before, and I think also used the
Compaq scheme.)

Windows 95 OSR2 introduced FAT32.

 The
 reason was that the number of sectors before a partition
 was still limited to 64 Ki so the extended partition was
 needed, in order to provide a new origin in the disk.

This I did not know.

  Anyway, this discussion is going astray from the
 original problem of Marcos Favero, for FDISK should have
 created the FAT 16 partitions he requested, whether or
 not some DOS versions could find all of them.

Thanks for the extra info!

-- 
Liam Proven • Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lpro...@gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven • LiveJournal/Twitter: lproven
MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com • ICQ: 73187508

--

___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout comments

2010-05-22 Thread dos386
 Compaq MS-DOS 3.31, large FAT32 partitions with up to 32 sectors
 per cluster for partitions up to 2GB

You meant probably:

Compaq MS-DOG 3.31, large FAT16 partitions with up to 64 sectors
per cluster (32 KiB) for partitions up to almost 2 GiB



-- 
~~~ wow ~~~

--

___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout comments

2010-05-22 Thread Liam Proven
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:59 AM, dos386 dos...@gmail.com wrote:
 Compaq MS-DOS 3.31, large FAT32 partitions with up to 32 sectors
 per cluster for partitions up to 2GB

 You meant probably:

 Compaq MS-DOG 3.31, large FAT16 partitions with up to 64 sectors
 per cluster (32 KiB) for partitions up to almost 2 GiB

You are absolutely right. I should have taken more care - sorry.

-- 
Liam Proven • Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lpro...@gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven • LiveJournal/Twitter: lproven
MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com • ICQ: 73187508

--

___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout comments

2010-05-21 Thread jasse...@itelefonica.com.br
Recently posted in this list:

(Alain Mouette)
No it has never been illegal, and it always worked 
just fine. I use these since forever... what happened 
is that most tools did not have a way of making them, 
but if you know how to make them it allways worked 
since MSDOS-3.

(Liam Proven)
 You have been lucky. I have seen many incorrectly-
partitioned systems with multiple primaries where 
some drives were not visible, on various versions 
of MS-DOS and up to Windows 95.

(Alain Mouette)
Not Lucky, just hard work. Partitions were invented 
without extended partitions, so it worked from the 
first...
FYI: I started using PC-DOS 1.1... so I have a long 
history of dos and don'ts...

 I do not have as long experience as either of you, but 
at least MSDOS 5.0 and PCDOS 6.3 (copies which I keep 
now, in original floppies) look for just one DOS primary 
and one DOS extended partition in each partition table. 
If there are more than one, the others are ignored. 
DRDOS and FreeDOS search all the partition table.
 AFAIK, DOS partitions were invented in MSDOS 3.3, to 
work around the 32 MB disk size limit, and from the 
beginning they had the primary/extended options. The 
reason was that the number of sectors before a partition 
was still limited to 64 Ki so the extended partition was 
needed, in order to provide a new origin in the disk. 
 Anyway, this discussion is going astray from the 
original problem of Marcos Favero, for FDISK should have 
created the FAT 16 partitions he requested, whether or 
not some DOS versions could find all of them.

Regards
 JAS  


--

___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout

2007-09-03 Thread chris evans
All labels are unique and contain the drive letter.  Do you consider 
DOS, W2K and Warp4 to be obscure?  Also every partition has a directory 
of the form 1_Name_X where X is the drive letter.  The one forces it 
to sort at the top.  So from any HDD utility or directory listing I know 
the physical position of each partition.

The users self identity on a computer should not be intricately related to the 
OS that is in use. WARP4, W2K, DOS?  what does that say about the *content* 
stored  by that  user?   

I have an additional challenge.  All my HDDs are front panel plug-in. 
So I have to give each HDD a unique ID that is seen by HDD utilities. 
If I was cloning or cleaning a drive and got it reversed that would not 
be good.  I have had a HDD utility swap drives 1 and 2 on it's display. 

Harddrive serial make and model or variant of such is what I use, that way I 
can see that yes it is from that seagate and not the western digital.. (I do 
this on my two tower machines with the shuttle drive bays)

--chris
http://www.aotksc.com/



That is rare, but it did happen.






   

Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout

2007-08-31 Thread chris evans
Better to label your drive volumes to something other than obscure or drive 
letters, like DATA, or your name. that way when you in a fdisk program or other 
OS you can see what is what and not cause an accident.  Curious, I thought that 
the DOS will only point C: to the first primary found? 

--chris
http://www.aotksc.com/rtwist/

- Original Message 
From: Alain M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 7:43:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout



Ray Davison escreveu:
 The labels include the drive letters, if they boot to their physical 
 position.  And that is the challenge.  Booting FreeDOS 1.0, the W2K-D 
 primary picks up the letter after any extended partitions.  With DRDOS 
 7.01 Fat32, they hold their physical position.

Extra (more than one) primary partition get a letter after all extended 
partitions. *That*is*the*rule*. If you boot Win98 or MS-DOS or FreeDOS 
from the second (physical order) primary partition, the other primary 
will also get the last letter.

FWIK, if there is an extended partition between 2 primaries, it makes no 
differece. But I am only 90% sure of that.

Some DR-DOS version have an extra bug, it has to boot from the first 
primary partition, that one will allways be called C:

Alain


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user





   

Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's 
Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. 
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout

2007-08-31 Thread Eric Auer

Hi, maybe it is useful to try SYS CONFIG to switch
the DLASORT option to 0 or 1. Please read the docs,
to be more exact, the config.txt file :-) Probably
still does not behave as DR DOS, but I do remember
that DLASORT is there because some people were not
happy with the behave as MS DOS default ;-).

Eric



This option is for specifying whether Drive Letter
Assignment should follow the normal MSDOS way of
all primary partitions across drives and then
extended partitions, or the more logical
all partitions (primary  extended) on the 1st
drive, then repeat for all following drives
(all primary  extended, then try next drive).
0 corresponds to MS way and 1 corresponds to first
drive completely, then next ...


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout

2007-08-31 Thread Ray Davison
Eric Auer wrote:
 Hi, maybe it is useful to try SYS CONFIG to switch
 the DLASORT option to 0 or 1. Please read the docs,
 to be more exact, the config.txt file :-) Probably
 still does not behave as DR DOS, but I do remember
 that DLASORT is there because some people were not
 happy with the behave as MS DOS default ;-).

A search for DLASORT*.* failed to find anything on the CD or HDD.  I 
also do not find dlasort in config.txt.
 
 This option is for specifying whether Drive Letter
 Assignment should follow the normal MSDOS way of
 all primary partitions across drives and then
 extended partitions, or the more logical
 all partitions (primary  extended) on the 1st
 drive, then repeat for all following drives
 (all primary  extended, then try next drive).
 0 corresponds to MS way and 1 corresponds to first
 drive completely, then next ...
 
Do you understand, C is stable.  On this drive D and E get swapped.  If 
I plug in the second HDD - which is a single extended - D is after that. 
  So, I have first primary; C, then all extended, then second primary; D 
- ignoring the primaries that are Boot Manager and the extended shells. 
  And Boot Manager is inert, C is active.

Ray

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout

2007-08-31 Thread Eric Auer

Hi!

  Hi, maybe it is useful to try SYS CONFIG to switch
  the DLASORT option to 0 or 1. Please read the docs
  to be more exact, the config.txt file :-)

Oops sorry I mean sys.txt, not config.txt ...

 A search for DLASORT*.* failed to find anything on the CD or HDD.
 I also do not find dlasort in config.txt.

 Do you understand, C is stable.  On this drive D and E get swapped. If
 I plug in the second HDD - which is a single extended - D is after that.

This is exactly what DLASORT is about - MS DOS style is the
default, which does all primary partitions first, but you
can also use the other setting, which is all partitions on
the first HDD first :-)

Eric



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout

2007-08-31 Thread Ray Davison
Eric Auer wrote:
 
 Oops sorry I mean sys.txt, not config.txt ...

OK.  There is also SYS.EN.

The only SYS I know about is SYS.COM.  I have been trying;
C:\FDOS\BIN\sys.com dlasort=X
Is this correct, and if so where do I put it?  So far all I have gotten 
is a SYS help screen.
 
Do you understand, C is stable.  On this drive D and E get swapped. If
I plug in the second HDD - which is a single extended - D is after that.
 
 This is exactly what DLASORT is about - MS DOS style is the
 default, which does all primary partitions first, but you
 can also use the other setting, which is all partitions on
 the first HDD first :-)

But it is NOT putting all primaries first.  It is putting the second 
after all extendeds.

Ray

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


[Freedos-user] Partition layout

2007-08-30 Thread Ray Davison
I have always had a single primary C for DOS and W9X, and everything 
else extended.  W2K then puts it's boot files on C.  That can cause 
problems trying to restore the W2K partition from backup.

So I created the drive below.  I am sure it will wrap.  Sorry.

The labels include the drive letters, if they boot to their physical 
position.  And that is the challenge.  Booting FreeDOS 1.0, the W2K-D 
primary picks up the letter after any extended partitions.  With DRDOS 
7.01 Fat32, they hold their physical position.

Ideas?

Ray


+---+--+-+--+++---+--++
|ID |Dr|Type, description|ux|Format  |Related |VolumeLabel| BM-Name 
|Size MiB|
+---+--disk  1---/dev/hda++---Disk1 - 
76+
|01 |  |Prim 0a IBM-BMGR | 1|BMGR|LVM |I13X-aware |BM:-- LVM| 
7.8|
|02|  |Prim 06 FAT16| 2|FAT16   |FRDOS4.1|DOS-C  |  | 
1004.0|
|03 |  |Prim 0b FAT32| 3|FAT32   |MSWIN4.1|W2K-D  |  | 
4000.5|
|04 |  |Log  06 FAT16| 5|FAT16   |MSWIN4.0|WARP4-E|  | 
1004.0|
|05 |  |FreeSpace Logical|  |-- -- --|-- -- --|- - - - - -|  | 
70300.0|
+---+--+-+--+++---+--++
 = Active/Startable * = Bootable r = Removable R = 
Removable+Active/Bootable

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Partition layout

2007-08-30 Thread john s wolter
I've got a SUSE LINUX Pro 9.3, IBM PC DOS 6.x(drive C:), MS-Win98E(drive
C:), IBM Warp 3(drive F:) on /dev/hda and booted using GRUB as a boot
manager.  GRUB has a number of features for booting most any OS which may
help your situation.   I hide and unhide various partitions as necessary to
get the drive layout configuration.  Notice that partition table entries are
not sequential.  IBM PC DOS 6.x boots as expected as drive C: while
/dev/hda2 is hidden; the reverse is used when booting Win98 SE from
/dev/hda2 instead of DOS.  GRUB has many features one may allow your
configuration  to work.

Here's the fdisk of it.

Disk /dev/hda: 8401 MB, 8401010688 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1021 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1 199 783 4699012+   5  Extended
/dev/hda2  25 198 1397655   16  Hidden FAT16
/dev/hda3   2  24  184747+   6  FAT16
/dev/hda4   *   1   18001a  OS/2 Boot Manager
/dev/hda5   * 199 202   32098+   4  FAT16 32M
/dev/hda6   * 203 215  1043917  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda7   * 216 267  417658+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda8   * 268 516 2616  FAT16
/dev/hda9   * 517 782 2136613+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda10  * 783 78380011  FAT12



On 8/30/07, Alain M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Ray Davison escreveu:
  The labels include the drive letters, if they boot to their physical
  position.  And that is the challenge.  Booting FreeDOS 1.0, the W2K-D
  primary picks up the letter after any extended partitions.  With DRDOS
  7.01 Fat32, they hold their physical position.

 Extra (more than one) primary partition get a letter after all extended
 partitions. *That*is*the*rule*. If you boot Win98 or MS-DOS or FreeDOS
 from the second (physical order) primary partition, the other primary
 will also get the last letter.

 FWIK, if there is an extended partition between 2 primaries, it makes no
 differece. But I am only 90% sure of that.

 Some DR-DOS version have an extra bug, it has to boot from the first
 primary partition, that one will allways be called C:

 Alain


 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
 Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
 Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
 Download your FREE copy of Splunk nowhttp://get.splunk.com/
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user




-- 
John S. Wolter President
Wolter Works
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Desk 1-734-665-1263
Cell: 1-734-904-8433
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now   http://get.splunk.com/___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user