Re: [Freedos-user] State of native FD 1.1 programs support for FAT32?

2016-02-25 Thread John Hupp
Thanks, Eric, I think that little roundup covers the question. On 2/25/2016 7:48 AM, Eric Auer wrote: > Hi John, > > most DOS programs do not care at all what type of drive you use. > > Only disk manipulation matters: For example CHKDSK does not, but > the alternative DOSFSCK does support fat32.

Re: [Freedos-user] State of native FD 1.1 programs support for FAT32?

2016-02-25 Thread Eric Auer
Hi John, most DOS programs do not care at all what type of drive you use. Only disk manipulation matters: For example CHKDSK does not, but the alternative DOSFSCK does support fat32. Support in FORMAT & FDISK is complete. Support in DEFRAG is very limited. What else would you like to know about

Re: [Freedos-user] State of native FD 1.1 programs support for FAT32?

2016-02-24 Thread Don Flowers
Whatever issues I have found have been totally unrelated to FAT32 (well today, I found an installer that wouldn't install to a FAT32 partition, but that was a rare find); most issues I have are of the Freecom variety I have to LOADFIX way too many programs, but .082 fixes that for my most stubborn

[Freedos-user] State of native FD 1.1 programs support for FAT32?

2016-02-24 Thread John Hupp
I haven't looked at this question for a long time so it probably bears asking again. I have been using 2GB FAT16 partitions because of my recollection that some of the FreeDOS programs didn't support FAT32 properly. I'm sorry I don't have notes on the particulars, just a recollection of my