Re: [Freedos-user] XDMA, SHSUCDX and other split-version programs

2005-06-19 Thread Jim Hall
Let's keep this thread only for XDMA and SHSUCDX ... please leave discussion about Eric's FreeDOS EDIT to the other thread. Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I think XDMA belongs in "Util" since it doesn't try to duplicate functionality in MS-DOS. We made an exception with UDMA and UDM

[Freedos-user] XDMA, SHSUCDX and other split-version programs

2005-06-18 Thread eric
Hi! > I think XDMA belongs in "Util" since it doesn't try to duplicate > functionality in MS-DOS. We made an exception with UDMA and UDMA2, > though .. and I guess I'm open to discussion about moving XDMA into > "Base" as well. I think neither belongs to BASE. Instead, it would be very good