Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Zbigniew zbigniew2...@gmail.com wrote:
No, no such exotic options,
Well, I would maybe recommend I=TEST X=TEST.
and using JEMM386 didn't help
Again, I think it's better to LOAD and UNLOAD from cmdline (JEMM386)
when needed to avoid such problems.
-
2014-06-30 19:19 GMT+02:00, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Zbigniew zbigniew2...@gmail.com wrote:
No, no such exotic options,
Well, I would maybe recommend I=TEST X=TEST.
I used - and still use - exactly the two above.
IIRC, 4DOS can swap out (since it's
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Zbigniew zbigniew2...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-06-30 19:19 GMT+02:00, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com:
IIRC, 4DOS can swap out (since it's quite large) to conserve
conventional memory. You may have to change that setting (SWAPPING ??
I forget ...). I don't think it's
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Zbigniew zbigniew2...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-06-30 19:19 GMT+02:00, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com:
IIRC, 4DOS can swap out (since it's quite large) to conserve
conventional memory. You may have to change that setting (SWAPPING ??
I forget ...). I don't think
What I also noticed, Turbo C 2.01 doesn't like JEMMEX - while having
around 32 MB of EMS and 1 GB of XMS, I cannot switch to shell from its
IDE; it complained: not enough memory, press Esc.
No such problem when using XMGR instead of JEMMEX.
--
Z.
I am not sure it's related to the XMS manager you use. It's rather a
matter of the amount of conventional memory you have. Maybe when using
XMGR you end up with more free memory 640K than when using Jemmex?
Mateusz
On 06/29/2014 03:20 PM, Zbigniew wrote:
What I also noticed, Turbo C 2.01
2014-06-29 15:25 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr:
I am not sure it's related to the XMS manager you use.
Unfortunately, it seems to be related.
It's rather a matter of the amount of conventional memory you have.
No, it was what I checked first before posting.
Maybe when using
Strange then. Maybe Jemmex provides more memory overall, but it's
fragmented for some reasons? MEM should tell you the size of the longest
contiguous block in memory (largest executable block size IIRC).
Mateusz
On 06/29/2014 03:45 PM, Zbigniew wrote:
2014-06-29 15:25 GMT+02:00, Mateusz
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Zbigniew zbigniew2...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-06-29 15:25 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr:
I am not sure it's related to the XMS manager you use.
Unfortunately, it seems to be related.
It's rather a matter of the amount of conventional memory
2014-06-29 21:16 GMT+02:00, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com:
I don't know which versions exactly, but AFAIK, Turbo C tries to use
EMS by default (if found) but not XMS (without some cmdline switches).
So who knows if it's getting confused here. Remember that 32 MB of EMS
is a lot (to it)!
Are you
I noticed another issue while using Turbo C 2.01:
If in the fdconfig.sys there is uide.sys used (or uide2.sys used for
HDD) - the compilation is incredibly slow (100x or 200x times slower).
But it is enough to _not_ use this driver, or to use uide2.sys with
parameter like /D:CDROM, to have Turbo
The uide drivers gets updated rather frequently. Find the latest here
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/ellis
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Zbigniew zbigniew2...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed another issue while using Turbo C 2.01:
If in the fdconfig.sys there is
2014-06-19 1:05 GMT+02:00, Louis Santillan lpsan...@gmail.com:
The uide drivers gets updated rather frequently. Find the latest here
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/ellis
Well I used the latest one - and it turned out, that older uide2.sys
is more Turbo C
Hi!
After a fresh install of FreeDos, I found turbo c 2.01 is terribly slow to
run.
That depends on what you mean by Turbo C. The IDE (editor) of it?
Compiler? Some program written in Turbo C? What kind of program?
even the speed of scrolling the screen is unacceptable. However,
when I
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
Hi!
After a fresh install of FreeDos, I found turbo c 2.01 is terribly slow to
run.
That depends on what you mean by Turbo C. The IDE (editor) of it?
Compiler? Some program written in Turbo C? What kind of program?
I
15 matches
Mail list logo
