> It's more possible than ever [0] to compile the kernel with GCC.
'This part of DJGPP is dedicated to the 16-bit tools that have been developed
to assist in using DJGPP.
Note: I lost interest in these projects before I completed them.'
> Yes, it would be a large under taking but maybe a long
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Louis Santillan wrote:
>
> It's more possible than ever [0] to compile the kernel with GCC.
> Skeeto/Chris Wells posted [1][2] an example of compiling 16-bit code
> with djgpp/GCC, including a linker script for linking 386+ real mode
>
Hi Ruxgulo,
I just saw your answer, thanks for having replid so quickly :).
I confess not using wine either, unless I'm forced to, which is to play a
very few games, especially on BSD, where Steam is not available. Still,
despite having set it, I launch these games very rarely as well, since,
Hi Louis, thank you very much for the info.
I was not aware of those projects ongoing underneath, mainly because I
didn't have the time to make a deeper research or ask.
Seems very interesting; guess I'll enjoying seeing if and when that kernel
will be available in the next releases
Cheers!,
Hi Eric,
and thank you for all the information you provided! If I have some time to
spare I'll give a look to any of the tips you suggested above above.
> PS: There is a Blinky FreeDOS thing for Super Tux Cart?
> For Linux? Sounds interesting! Where did it come from?
If you find yourself
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Paolo Vincenzo Olivo wrote:
>
>> We can't rest on our laurels. We need to be open to obvious
>> improvements.
>
> This is a high-minded, wise way of talking I hadn't heard in a while. One
> point to you, deserved
There's always more to do.
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Paolo Vincenzo Olivo wrote:
> Thank you for your answer Ruxgulo but I think I've been misunderstood in some
> parts, where I admit I may not have made myself clear
>
>> Just get a cheap Chromebook, if you need all these modern niceties.
>
>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
[SNIP]
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Paolo Vincenzo Olivo
> wrote:
[SNIP]
>> Anyway, as clearly stated on FreeDOS home page, the purposes for ever
>> installing it are in fact
>> legacy softwares,
> We can't rest on our laurels. We need to be open to obvious
> improvements.
This is a high-minded, wise way of talking I hadn't heard in a while. One
point to you, deserved
(But I'm not talking about stupid multimedia stuff or
> anything overkill like that. I'm thinking much more
Thank you for your answer Ruxgulo but I think I've been misunderstood in some
parts, where I admit I may not have made myself clear
> No Javascript support is one obvious omission. But "modern" web (HTML
> 5, etc) practically demands Firefox or Chrome anyways. Just get a
> cheap Chromebook,
Hi,
Just to add (more) $0.02
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Paolo Vincenzo Olivo wrote:
> Hello there FreeDOS community,
> I've been a FreeDOS user for 3 years so far, and I'd like to thank the
> developers
> for their effort and their amazing job.
They've
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> (sorry everybody about the long answer... The short
> answer is "would be nice to have a Wiki page about
> situations where WfW 3.11 can be made to run, but I
> still think that this has mostly novelty value only)
Hi Paolo,
(sorry everybody about the long answer... The short
answer is "would be nice to have a Wiki page about
situations where WfW 3.11 can be made to run, but I
still think that this has mostly novelty value only)
> I guess people who commonly use Windows,
> and don't feel comfortable with
13 matches
Mail list logo