Re: [Freedos-user] Kernel question

2006-09-08 Thread Eric Auer
Hi, I called the file release 2036test because I had expected some small bugs to be found soon after that release. And indeed, after 2036test, I had to fix the VERSION= handling and I found that COM port polling can be improved. Those updates are what makes 2036test differ from 2036final, if you

Re: [Freedos-user] Kernel question

2006-09-08 Thread tekno1911
Or the quote on the web page should be End War by Waging Peace... --chris http://www.aotksc.com/ Original Message Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Kernel question From: Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, September 07, 2006 10:10 pm To: freedos-user

Re: [Freedos-user] Kernel question

2006-09-07 Thread Blair Campbell
I would definitely consider the 2036 kernel to be more stable, but not the one on sourceforge. Get the one from Eric Auer's homepage (google for Auersoft). On 9/7/06, Daniel Quintiliani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi FreeDOS team, Congrats on the release of FreeDOS 1.0 stable! As the

Re: [Freedos-user] Kernel question

2006-09-07 Thread Daniel Quintiliani
Quoting Daniel Quintiliani [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi FreeDOS team, Congrats on the release of FreeDOS 1.0 stable! As the maintainer of the GNU/DOS distribution, I had a question to ask. I noticed that FreeDOS 1.0 was considered stable, yet the kernel file on the SourceForge page was called

Re: [Freedos-user] Kernel question

2006-05-18 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! Michael McStarfighter wrote: I want to know if the original FreeDOS kernel is 16bit or 32bit. It always have 16-bit interface, notwithstanding if internally it contains only 16-bit code or some code optimized as 32-bit. I ask it because I coincidentally found the website