Hi, I called the file release 2036test because I had expected
some small bugs to be found soon after that release. And indeed,
after 2036test, I had to fix the VERSION= handling and I found
that COM port polling can be improved. Those updates are what
makes 2036test differ from 2036final, if you
Or the quote on the web page should be End War by Waging Peace...
--chris
http://www.aotksc.com/
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Kernel question
From: Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, September 07, 2006 10:10 pm
To: freedos-user
I would definitely consider the 2036 kernel to be more stable, but not
the one on sourceforge. Get the one from Eric Auer's homepage (google
for Auersoft).
On 9/7/06, Daniel Quintiliani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi FreeDOS team,
Congrats on the release of FreeDOS 1.0 stable!
As the
Quoting Daniel Quintiliani [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi FreeDOS team,
Congrats on the release of FreeDOS 1.0 stable!
As the maintainer of the GNU/DOS distribution, I had a question to
ask. I noticed that FreeDOS 1.0 was considered stable, yet the
kernel file on the SourceForge page was called
Hi!
Michael McStarfighter wrote:
I want to know if the original FreeDOS kernel is 16bit or 32bit.
It always have 16-bit interface, notwithstanding if internally it
contains only 16-bit code or some code optimized as 32-bit.
I ask it because I coincidentally found the website