On Sun, 09 May 2004 10:02:42 +0200, you wrote: Hi,
>Arachne is under GPL now! Quite some time ago, and some fans have new cores up to version 1.73 >I was very happy when i heard this news and wanted to help developing >it. But i am very said, that the code is very bad. I guess, ARACHNE's guy tired of the code and don't want to spend time on it anymore because the code was too complex >For example many functions has GOTO commands and it is very difficult to >add new futures (if somebody would port it to DJGPP again). I can't code so I've no idea, but choosing the correct development tool is very important, maybe the coders here can advise >It also insn't very fast. I think because it uses XMS and other caches, >which would be obsolete with a 32-BIT compiler(DJGPP). How about OpenWatcom? >btw: the last version of the text-browser lynx supports frames.... For today's websites, text-browser is not enough. So ARACHNE is the only choice. Rgds, Johnson. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
