Re: [Freedos-user] XCDROM V1.9
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 01:09:22 -0800 (PST), you wrote: Hi Hubert, Can you please email me directly, got a test XCDROM version for you. My email: johnson=tmfc.net (change to email format) Rgds, Johnson. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] XCDROM V1.9
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 01:09:22 -0800 (PST), you wrote: Hi, >I've found a a bug in initialization procedure of XCDROM (all versions, even >1.9). Can you please try XCDROM v2.0? A compatibility of startup time changed, maybe it affect TEAC CD-drive. I'm willing to see if v2.0 fixed the problem or not. >I have two CD-Rom drives, a TEAC CD-540E (master secondary port) and a >CD-Writer CyberDrive CW038D (slave secondary port). >The problem is, that the CyberDrive Writer is recognized by XCDROM only, if >parameter /SS or combination /SS /SM is given. Other combinations lead to an >Identify Device error and XCDROM does not load. > >The following list shows possible combinations and the result with these two >drives: >- Automatic detect (no switch /SS /SM is given): Only TEAC CD-540E is detected >(bug) >- Switch /SM: TEAC CD-540E is detected (ok) >- Switch /SS: CyberDrive CW038D is detected (ok) >- Switches /SM /SS: TEAC CD-540E is detected - Identify Device error for >CyberDrive (bug) >- Switches /SS /SM: CyberDrive and TEAC are detected (ok) > >I've exchanged XCDROM with VIDE-CD.SYS or OAKCDROM.SYS - the drives are >recognized correctly. Furthermore there is no detection problem by the BIOS or >WINDOWS. > >I changed the CyberDrive writer with a TEAC CDW-512EB. All is working fine >with these two TEAC drives. > >The difficuly seems to be the CyberDrive writer - maybe the detection function >can be adapted slightly so that the detection difficulties are solved. > >Thanks for the great work so far. Thanks for reporting the problem, I'll forward to author. Rgds, Johnson. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] XCDROM V1.9
Hello, I've found a a bug in initialization procedure of XCDROM (all versions, even 1.9). I have two CD-Rom drives, a TEAC CD-540E (master secondary port) and a CD-Writer CyberDrive CW038D (slave secondary port). The problem is, that the CyberDrive Writer is recognized by XCDROM only, if parameter /SS or combination /SS /SM is given. Other combinations lead to an Identify Device error and XCDROM does not load. The following list shows possible combinations and the result with these two drives: - Automatic detect (no switch /SS /SM is given): Only TEAC CD-540E is detected (bug) - Switch /SM: TEAC CD-540E is detected (ok) - Switch /SS: CyberDrive CW038D is detected (ok) - Switches /SM /SS: TEAC CD-540E is detected - Identify Device error for CyberDrive (bug) - Switches /SS /SM: CyberDrive and TEAC are detected (ok) I've exchanged XCDROM with VIDE-CD.SYS or OAKCDROM.SYS - the drives are recognized correctly. Furthermore there is no detection problem by the BIOS or WINDOWS. I changed the CyberDrive writer with a TEAC CDW-512EB. All is working fine with these two TEAC drives. The difficuly seems to be the CyberDrive writer - maybe the detection function can be adapted slightly so that the detection difficulties are solved. Thanks for the great work so far. Regards, Hubert View this message in context: Re: XCDROM V1.9 Sent from the FreeDOS - User forum at Nabble.com.
