Re: [Freedos-user] re: My experiment with Windows 3.1 on FreeDOS in VMware

2005-09-05 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi!

3-Сен-2005 23:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:

EA> CuteMouse may fail to detect that Windows is active. Then CuteMouse
EA> would keep trying to access the mouse hardware while the Windows
EA> mouse driver is doing the same. Solution: Do not load CuteMouse.

 When Windows 9x runs own driver(s) for mice, it hides consequent
resources (UARTs, PS/2 port), so running CuteMouse before or inside Windows
is (probably) safe. Under Win3 running CM is neccessary for supporting mouse
in DOS boxes.

EA> Default is a factor of 4, but Windows 3.1 cannot handle more than
EA> 1 GB of virtual memory

 ...and 64 Mb of real memory?




---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] re: My experiment with Windows 3.1 on FreeDOS in VMware

2005-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Eric,

-- Original Message -
Subject: [Freedos-user] re: My experiment with Windows 3.1 on FreeDOS in VMware
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 23:37:47 +0200 (MEST)
From: Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net

Heh, I love spreading FUD against MS ;-).

FUD?

The crash when attempting to run a DOS program or DOS box from
within Windows is caused by wswap exe or dswap exe of Windows
being unable to "swap the context" of the DOS session with the
FreeDOS kernel. In other words, they cannot modify the running DOS
to make it "free" to start a new DOS program while Windows is still
around in the background.

Do you exactly know what DSWAP does in order to try and swap the context?

Aitor


---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] re: My experiment with Windows 3.1 on FreeDOS in VMware

2005-09-03 Thread Robert Morales

On 9/3/2005 4:37 PM, Eric Auer wrote:


http://www.deskwork.de/DOWNLOAD/DOS/WINDOWS.TXT has some additional
hints in German: It basically recommends using /D:sfvcx (no system
breakpoints in UMB/ROM area, no 32bit disk access, no virtual hard-
disk IRQs, no 32bit file access, no usage of UMB/pageframe area).
Not all Windows versions have all of those /D:... options.
 

Yeah, I remember seeing that in the Wikipedia article on FreeDOS... but 
my Windows doesn't seem to recognize *any* of the /D options. Every time 
/D is specified, Program Manager tries to execute it as a program.



---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user