Re: [Freedos-user] recovering a file? (fwd)

2013-11-10 Thread Karen Lewellen
Why are you writing me privately for a list discussion?
Not sure why these would be plain text either,  they are wordperfect 6.0, 
actually, or why it impacts my use of 
Norton utilities 8.0 edition of unerace.
let's focus on what I am asking, since  we may get to the goal this way.
plain text lol.


-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 13:57:02 +0100
From: Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de
To: Karen Lewellen klewel...@shellworld.net
Subject: Re: recovering a file?


Hi Karen,

so the files are on a FAT32 partition and are 12 kB
and 125 kB in size, respectively. What type of file
are they, plain text? How big are the files which
overwrote them, respectively?

Regards, Eric

 What type are the two involved files? Text? How
 big are they? Which partition types are the on?
 Do you know parts of the to be recovered file,
 so you could search the raw disk if necessary?


--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most 
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] recovering a file? (fwd)

2013-11-10 Thread Karen Lewellen
Well let me state publicly again that private communications are unwelcome 
unless I have granted you permission.  Told you that before, then simply 
kept ignoring your private efforts...feel sure you will not make that 
mistake again.
I have just posted  a comparative  question at the wp for dos forum at 
wordperfect universe.
www.wpuniverse.com
Where I am a member.
Equally working the discussion through the  survpc list where I have been 
a member for decades.
Unless someone knows the answer to my spinwrite question, those lists may 
be more helpful than here.  Others  using Norton  utilities v 8.0 not 
withstanding of course.



On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Eric Auer wrote:


 Hi Karen,

 Why are you writing me privately for a list discussion?

 Because I had asked several times without getting an
 answer, so I assumed you might want to keep those
 details off-list.

 Not sure why these would be plain text either,  they are wordperfect 6.0,
 actually, or why it impacts my use of Norton utilities 8.0 edition of 
 unerase.

 Wordperfect files according to the file tool start
 with the byte sequence ff 57 50 53 c4 05, in other
 words the byte ff, then the text WPC, then the two
 bytes c4 05. This information can help you to find
 the start of a deleted wordperfect file even when
 undelete cannot find the deleted directory entry of
 the file any more: Disk editors typically have some
 function to search the raw disk for contents. Also,
 you know that the sequence must be at the start of
 a cluster to be a match. Note that this is about
 current WordPerfect versions: You have to check on
 your own computer if files made by your version do
 start the same. According to some notes from 2001,
 the textual part of WordPerfect files is visible if
 you look at the file with a text editor, mixed with
 binary markup data. In other words, you should be
 able to recognize whether a certain cluster can be
 part of your to-be-recovered file. Of course all of
 this is quite tedious, so you typically try how far
 you can get with automated tools first...

 let's focus on what I am asking, since  we may get to the goal this way.
 plain text lol.

 Sure. Keep us updated about your progress. If you
 can avoid writing to your disk for a while, the
 best way is to work slowly and carefully, maybe
 waiting until you are in position to get a disk
 image. Once you have a disk image stored in some
 foolproof way, you can start working on the real
 disk again. Because then you can work on recovery
 of the two files at any later moment, using that
 image file and no longer have to worry about work
 with the real disk causing further damage.

 Regards, Eric



 --
 November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
 Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
 techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most
 from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
 http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user



--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most 
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] recovering a file? (fwd)

2013-11-10 Thread Tom Ehlert
Dear Mr. Lewellen,


 Well let me state publicly again that private communications are unwelcome
 unless I have granted you permission.  Told you that before, then simply
 kept ignoring your private efforts...feel sure you will not make that 
 mistake again.

you are wasting our valuable time. please go away to
www.wpuniverse.com, survpc list, or wherever you feel comfortable.
but go.

Tom




 I have just posted  a comparative  question at the wp for dos forum at
 wordperfect universe.
 www.wpuniverse.com
 Where I am a member.
 Equally working the discussion through the  survpc list where I have been
 a member for decades.
 Unless someone knows the answer to my spinwrite question, those lists may
 be more helpful than here.  Others  using Norton  utilities v 8.0 not 
 withstanding of course.



 On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Eric Auer wrote:


 Hi Karen,

 Why are you writing me privately for a list discussion?

 Because I had asked several times without getting an
 answer, so I assumed you might want to keep those
 details off-list.

 Not sure why these would be plain text either,  they are wordperfect 6.0,
 actually, or why it impacts my use of Norton utilities 8.0 edition of 
 unerase.

 Wordperfect files according to the file tool start
 with the byte sequence ff 57 50 53 c4 05, in other
 words the byte ff, then the text WPC, then the two
 bytes c4 05. This information can help you to find
 the start of a deleted wordperfect file even when
 undelete cannot find the deleted directory entry of
 the file any more: Disk editors typically have some
 function to search the raw disk for contents. Also,
 you know that the sequence must be at the start of
 a cluster to be a match. Note that this is about
 current WordPerfect versions: You have to check on
 your own computer if files made by your version do
 start the same. According to some notes from 2001,
 the textual part of WordPerfect files is visible if
 you look at the file with a text editor, mixed with
 binary markup data. In other words, you should be
 able to recognize whether a certain cluster can be
 part of your to-be-recovered file. Of course all of
 this is quite tedious, so you typically try how far
 you can get with automated tools first...

 let's focus on what I am asking, since  we may get to the goal this way.
 plain text lol.

 Sure. Keep us updated about your progress. If you
 can avoid writing to your disk for a while, the
 best way is to work slowly and carefully, maybe
 waiting until you are in position to get a disk
 image. Once you have a disk image stored in some
 foolproof way, you can start working on the real
 disk again. Because then you can work on recovery
 of the two files at any later moment, using that
 image file and no longer have to worry about work
 with the real disk causing further damage.

 Regards, Eric



 --
 November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
 Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
 techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most
 from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
 http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user



 --
 November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
 Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
 techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most
 from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
 http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user



Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards
Tom Ehlert
+49-241-79886


--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most 
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] recovering a file? (fwd)

2013-11-10 Thread Eric Auer

Hi Karen,

please let me clarify: My ignored question was regarding
the sizes of the damaged files and the files that overwrote
them and the file format of those files. Of course having
important files almost lost causes a lot of stress, but
asking off-list was not meant to waste your private time.

I just guessed that you considered the properties of those
four files private, hence I gave it a try to ask off-list,
after asking on-list first.

Looking forward to hear about the progress of the recovery,
of course on-list. If new questions arise, please let the
list know...

Regards, Eric

PS: Given that the involved files are in WordPerfect format,
it was a good idea to ask the WP for DOS community as well.
Not sure what the link to Survpc and Spinrite is, though.

PPS: Apparently Norton Utilities 8 came out ca. 1994, making
it sensible that Wikipedia says it had no FAT32 support, but
maybe there was an update from Norton for NU 8 owners later.



--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most 
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user