Re: [Freedos-user] tunz problems in freedos

2011-01-27 Thread Roy Tam
Hi Rugxulo, 2011/1/28 Rugxulo : > Hi, > > On 1/27/11, Roy Tam wrote: >> 2011/1/28 Rugxulo : >>> On 1/27/11, Roy Tam wrote: I wonder how you can make it so small that ordinary UPX --ultra-brute can't reach that level. >>> >>> Hmmm? Which .EXE? I didn't do anything fancy for OpenWat

Re: [Freedos-user] tunz problems in freedos

2011-01-27 Thread Roy Tam
Hi Rugxulo, 2011/1/28 Rugxulo : > Hi, > > On 1/27/11, Roy Tam wrote: >> >>> Yes, well, it's UPX'd with DOS extender (D3X) bound. Yeah, it's small, >>> but it doesn't support LFNs. The DJGPP one is approx. 50 kb (also >>> UPX'd, with a few size tweaks from me). >> >> I wonder how you can make it s

Re: [Freedos-user] tunz problems in freedos

2011-01-27 Thread Roy Tam
Hi all, 2011/1/28 Rugxulo : > Hi, sorry if this is vaguely long, just skim it, > > On 1/27/11, Eric Auer wrote: >> >> Dunno, TUNZ apparently is just SO simple that it does not >> process the actual size of the extra field at all, so if >> you have that field, TUNZ gets the data offset wrong... >

Re: [Freedos-user] tunz problems in freedos

2011-01-25 Thread Roy Tam
Hi, 2011/1/26 Rugxulo : > Hi again, > > On 1/25/11, Eric Auer wrote: >> >>> What did you use to create the .ZIP? >> >> Dunno, it was just the smallest ZIP in my temp dir, >> >> After using ZIP -d to remove the deflated ASM file, >> I got a file which even unzips with any ZIP 1.0 or >> newer, only

Re: [Freedos-user] tunz problems in freedos

2011-01-25 Thread Roy Tam
Hi, 2011/1/26 Rugxulo : > Hi, > > On 1/25/11, Roy Tam wrote: >> >> 2011/1/26 Eric Auer : >>> >> Thanks for your information! I did use 7-zip heavily in the past and >> now I'd give advzip a try. > > AdvZip (and AdvDef, etc.) use 7-Zip's improved Deflate verbatim from > the (now old 4.42) LZMA SDK

Re: [Freedos-user] tunz problems in freedos

2011-01-25 Thread Roy Tam
Hi all! 2011/1/26 Eric Auer : > > Hi! > >>> It is a cute tiny 2560 byte small unzipper by Lucho :-) >> >> Phil Katz, actually, but anyways ...  ;-) > > Dunno, I assume it is a highly tuned implementation. > >> What did you use to create the .ZIP? > > Dunno, it was just the smallest ZIP in my temp