This was fix released for lunar on
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-ldap/11.10-4ubuntu0.1
** Changed in: bind-dyndb-ldap (Ubuntu Lunar)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of FreeIPA,
which is subscribed to
Successfully installed 11.9-5ubuntu0.22.04.3 from jammy-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of FreeIPA,
which is subscribed to bind-dyndb-ldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978849
Title:
bind9-dyndb-ldap has unmet dependencies
Status in
This bug was fixed in the package bind-dyndb-ldap -
11.9-5ubuntu0.22.04.3
---
bind-dyndb-ldap (11.9-5ubuntu0.22.04.3) jammy-security; urgency=medium
* No-change rebuild for bind9 security update.
-- Marc Deslauriers Wed, 20 Sep 2023
15:58:12 -0400
** Changed in:
For the jammy verification:
DEP8 tests are green:
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#bind-dyndb-ldap
Package built correctly in all arches:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-
ldap/11.9-5ubuntu0.22.04.2
And was test-installed in
Lunar verification
DEP8 results are green: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-
migration/lunar/update_excuses.html#bind-dyndb-ldap
Build OK in all arches: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-
ldap/11.10-4ubuntu0.1
Also did a quick manual install of the proposed package:
thanks for testing
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of FreeIPA,
which is subscribed to bind-dyndb-ldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978849
Title:
bind9-dyndb-ldap
Hello Timo,
Tested installing bind9-dyndb-ldap from -proposed with the following
outline:
- enable proposed archive
- install bind9-dyndb-ldap. Dependencies are installed from either
jammy-updates/main or jammy/main
- configure apt to allow selective installs of packages from proposed
Hello Jan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted bind-dyndb-ldap into lunar-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-
ldap/11.10-4ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and
+
+ * justification for backporting the fix to the stable release.
+
+ * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an
+explanation of how the upload fixes this bug.
+
+ [
The focal situation explained in the last comments above is still more
complicated than originally thought. Looks like bind-dyndb-ldap never
really worked in focal.
Some options:
a) fire up gdb, and see where exactly it's failing. It could be a symbol clash,
an incorrect library being linked in,
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-ldap/+git/bind-dyndb-ldap/+merge/450608
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of FreeIPA,
which is subscribed to bind-dyndb-ldap in Ubuntu.
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-ldap/+git/bind-dyndb-ldap/+merge/450607
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of FreeIPA,
which is subscribed to bind-dyndb-ldap in Ubuntu.
So in focal we get this missing symbol:
04-Sep-2023 14:33:22.532 failed to dynamically load instance 'ldap_zone'
driver '/usr/lib/bind/ldap.so': /usr/lib/bind/ldap.so: undefined symbol:
cfg_parse_buffer2 (failure)
That comes from the libisccfg library. If I link with it, however, we get:
** Changed in: bind-dyndb-ldap (Ubuntu Lunar)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: bind-dyndb-ldap (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: bind-dyndb-ldap (Ubuntu Lunar)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: bind-dyndb-ldap (Ubuntu Jammy)
Fixed in mantic with the rebuild in
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-ldap/11.10-6build1
** Changed in: bind-dyndb-ldap (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Also affects: bind9 (Ubuntu Lunar)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects:
Given that the soname in bind9-libs is an exact copy of the package
version, including the ubuntu suffix, it will change with even a no-
change rebuild:
$ objdump -x
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbind9-9.18.12-0ubuntu0.22.04.3~local1-Ubuntu.so |
grep SONAME
SONAME
There is nothing to do in the bind9 package, so marking that task as
invalid. The DEP8 test was added to bind in a separate bug (#2032650).
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of FreeIPA,
which
Summary:
# focal
focal's src:bind-dyndb-ldap situation is more complicated, a simple
rebuild won't fix it. In focal we have two bind9 sources:
src:bind9-libs, and src:bind9, at very different versions. Focal's bind-
dyndb-ldap does not work with the version of src:bind9 shipped there,
hence
This is being fixed in bug #2003586, and the package is already in
proposed:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-ldap/11.9-5ubuntu0.22.04.1
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-ldap/11.10-1ubuntu0.22.10.1
Unfortunately the changes file doesn't list this bug, so it won't
Requirements have diverged further:
bind9 : Depends: bind9-libs (= 1:9.18.1-1ubuntu1.3)
bind9-dyndb-ldap : Depends: bind9-libs (= 1:9.18.1-1ubuntu1)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of FreeIPA,
which is subscribed to bind-dyndb-ldap in Ubuntu.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: bind-dyndb-ldap (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of FreeIPA,
which is subscribed to bind-dyndb-ldap in Ubuntu.
I'm having the same issue on ARM based packages.
bind01:~$ sudo apt install bind9-dyndb-ldap
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if
22 matches
Mail list logo
