Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 754 ensure hostnames are lower-case

2011-03-17 Thread Martin Kosek
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 18:05 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: If a hostname has mixed-case in /etc/hosts or a mixed-case name is passed into either the client or host installer we need to prevent installation. The hostname should be lower-case otherwise all sorts of odd problems will happen.

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 754 ensure hostnames are lower-case

2011-03-17 Thread Rob Crittenden
Martin Kosek wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 18:05 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: If a hostname has mixed-case in /etc/hosts or a mixed-case name is passed into either the client or host installer we need to prevent installation. The hostname should be lower-case otherwise all sorts of odd problems

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 754 ensure hostnames are lower-case

2011-03-17 Thread Martin Kosek
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 10:24 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: Martin Kosek wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 18:05 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: If a hostname has mixed-case in /etc/hosts or a mixed-case name is passed into either the client or host installer we need to prevent installation. The

[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 755 upgrade IPA on installation

2011-03-17 Thread Rob Crittenden
Re-enable ldapi code in ipa-ldap-updater and remove the searchbase restriction when run in --upgrade mode. This allows us to autobind giving root Directory Manager powers. This also: * corrects the ipa-ldap-updater man page * remove automatic --realm, --server, --domain options * handle

[Freeipa-devel] Determine KDC for a website

2011-03-17 Thread Adam Young
I'm trying to figure out what should happen in the following case; A user goes to a website that they've never visited before. The site is using Kerberos, and thus the browser gets back a Negotiate response. At this point, the browser chops the hostname off the URL and requests the TXT

[Freeipa-devel] admiyo-0214-1-pwpolicy-priority

2011-03-17 Thread Adam Young
From d8c6d615a87a9f8d06260ad06d4caec6ddd55526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:52:52 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] pwpolicy priority Priority is now a required field in order to add a new password policy. Thus, not having the field present means we

Re: [Freeipa-devel] admiyo-0214-1-pwpolicy-priority

2011-03-17 Thread Endi Sukma Dewata
On 3/17/2011 7:04 PM, Adam Young wrote: Some issues: 1. There's a jslint warning. 2. Try creating a new password policy, then edit and change the priority. When you click Update the priority will get updated but the field will become read only.