[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#69][+rejected] Fix ipa-replica-install with RHEL 6.8 master

2016-09-16 Thread mbasti-rh
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/69 Title: #69: Fix ipa-replica-install with RHEL 6.8 master Label: +rejected -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA:

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#69][closed] Fix ipa-replica-install with RHEL 6.8 master

2016-09-16 Thread mbasti-rh
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/69 Author: flo-renaud Title: #69: Fix ipa-replica-install with RHEL 6.8 master Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghfreeipa https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa git fetch ghfreeipa pull/69/head:pr69 git checkout pr69 --

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#69][comment] Fix ipa-replica-install with RHEL 6.8 master

2016-09-16 Thread flo-renaud
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/69 Title: #69: Fix ipa-replica-install with RHEL 6.8 master flo-renaud commented: """ Please ignore this PR as the issue has been fixed in IPA 3.0 (in ipa-replica-prepare). """ See the full comment at

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#69][comment] Fix ipa-replica-install with RHEL 6.8 master

2016-09-16 Thread pvoborni
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/69 Title: #69: Fix ipa-replica-install with RHEL 6.8 master pvoborni commented: """ Is it still needed? Seems that fixing IPA 3.0 fixes the issue. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/69#issuecomment-247603640 --

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#82][synchronized] Fix regexp in user/group name

2016-09-16 Thread mbasti-rh
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/82 Author: mbasti-rh Title: #82: Fix regexp in user/group name Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghfreeipa https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa git fetch ghfreeipa pull/82/head:pr82 git checkout pr82 From

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#89][comment] client: remove hard dependency on pam_krb5

2016-09-16 Thread stlaz
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/89 Title: #89: client: remove hard dependency on pam_krb5 stlaz commented: """ Works as expected. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/89#issuecomment-247579650 -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#89][+ack] client: remove hard dependency on pam_krb5

2016-09-16 Thread stlaz
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/89 Title: #89: client: remove hard dependency on pam_krb5 Label: +ack -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA:

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#82][comment] Fix regexp in user/group name

2016-09-16 Thread stlaz
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/82 Title: #82: Fix regexp in user/group name stlaz commented: """ Sure. But from what I see, this patch may possibly break idviews plugin for users of username of about 255 characters (see idoverrideuser - 'uid'), same for groups (with 'cn' ofc).

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#82] Fix regexp in user/group name (comment)

2016-09-16 Thread abbra
abbra commented on a pull request """ 'uid' in user object and 'cn' in group object have meaning in POSIX environments. 'cn' in other objects is not subject for strict limits. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/82#issuecomment-247541965 -- Manage your

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#82] Fix regexp in user/group name (comment)

2016-09-16 Thread stlaz
stlaz commented on a pull request """ Would the gist of this patch also apply to any of idviews, servicedelegation or topology plugins where a similar or slightly different regexp is used? Could we rather have the regexp as a constant somewhere so it does not have to be changed at all places

[Freeipa-devel] Github review feature

2016-09-16 Thread Martin Basti
Sorry for stealing your thread, but you started asking about github review emails :) Standard review inline comments are disabled on purpose, each comment generates one email, so we decided that is better after review to write a regular comment "NACK, please see inline comments" or so. I

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#83] Added a fix for setting Priority as required field (+ack)

2016-09-16 Thread stlaz
Akasurde's pull request #83: "Added a fix for setting Priority as required field " label *ack* has been added See the full pull-request at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/83 -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#83] Added a fix for setting Priority as required field (synchronized)

2016-09-16 Thread Akasurde
Akasurde's pull request #83: "Added a fix for setting Priority as required field " was synchronized See the full pull-request at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/83 ... or pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghfreeipa https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa git fetch ghfreeipa

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#83] Added a fix for setting Priority as required field (edited)

2016-09-16 Thread Akasurde
Akasurde's pull request #83: "Added a fix for setting Priority as required field " was edited See the full pull-request at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/83 ... or pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghfreeipa https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa git fetch ghfreeipa

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#83] Added a fix for setting Priority as required field (comment)

2016-09-16 Thread mbasti-rh
mbasti-rh commented on a pull request """ @Akasurde I said we need a *new* ticket for it. I opened one for you https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/6335 """ See the full comment at https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/83#issuecomment-247530662 -- Manage your subscription for the