Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jason Gerard DeRose wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 11:41 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
There are probably occasions where a caller will want more control
over what happens when running a command fails. I've added an
optional argument to run where it
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 11:41 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
There are probably occasions where a caller will want more control over
what happens when running a command fails. I've added an optional
argument to run where it will not raise an exception on errors.
Jason Gerard DeRose wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 11:41 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
There are probably occasions where a caller will want more control over
what happens when running a command fails. I've added an optional
argument to run where it will not raise an
