On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 15:18 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 09:05 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:27 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 17:28 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 09:05 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:27 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 17:28 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 15:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 09:05 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:27 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 17:28 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 15:21 -0400, Rob
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:27 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 17:28 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 15:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
We don't want to create private groups automatically for
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 17:28 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 15:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
We don't want to create private groups automatically for migrated users,
there could be namespace overlap (and race conditions prevent us from
trying to
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:27 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This patch is much better and covers my previous concerns. I just
find
an issue with UPG. It is not created for non-posix users when UPGs
are
enabled:
# echo Secret123 | ipa migrate-ds ldap://ldap.example.com
--with-compat
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:27 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This patch is much better and covers my previous concerns. I just
find
an issue with UPG. It is not created for non-posix users when UPGs
are
enabled:
# echo Secret123 | ipa migrate-ds ldap://ldap.example.com
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 15:25 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:27 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
This patch is much better and covers my previous concerns. I just
find
an issue with UPG. It is not created for non-posix users when UPGs
are
enabled:
We don't want to create private groups automatically for migrated users,
there could be namespace overlap (and race conditions prevent us from
trying to check in advance).
Check the sanity of groups in general, warn if the group for the
gidnumber doesn't exist at least on the remote server.
