Hello,
this patch fixes https://fedorahosted.org/bind-dyndb-ldap/ticket/49 ,
but I want to discuss one (unimplemented) change:
I propose a change in (currently very strange) forwarders syntax.
Current syntax:
IP[.port]
examples:
1.2.3.4 (without optional port)
1.2.3.4.5553 (optional port
And there is the patch, sorry.
Petr^2
On 02/29/2012 03:10 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
this patch fixes https://fedorahosted.org/bind-dyndb-ldap/ticket/49 ,
but I want to discuss one (unimplemented) change:
I propose a change in (currently very strange) forwarders syntax.
Current syntax:
Either way looks ok to me.
I agree that using a space may be less confusing if this syntax never
allows to specify multiple addresses.
If multiple address can be specified than it may be less ideal to use
spaces.
Simo.
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 15:14 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
And there is the
On 02/29/2012 04:30 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Either way looks ok to me.
I agree that using a space may be less confusing if this syntax never
allows to specify multiple addresses.
If multiple address can be specified than it may be less ideal to use
spaces.
Simo.
idnsForwarders is multi-value
I agree that we should keep the BIND syntax and separate port and IP
address with a space. We will at least avoid possible issues with IP
address decoding in the future.
Since this is a new attribute we have a good chance to do changes now so
that it is used correctly. I created an upstream
