On 11.01.2016 18:05, Martin Basti wrote:
On 11.01.2016 17:52, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 17:45 +0100, Martin Basti wrote:
On 14.12.2015 16:22, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
We always have to call find_base() in order to force libldap to
open
the socket. However, if no bas
On 11.01.2016 17:52, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 17:45 +0100, Martin Basti wrote:
On 14.12.2015 16:22, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
We always have to call find_base() in order to force libldap to
open
the socket. However, if no base is actually required then there is
no reas
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 17:45 +0100, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 14.12.2015 16:22, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > We always have to call find_base() in order to force libldap to
> > open
> > the socket. However, if no base is actually required then there is
> > no reason to error out if find_base()
On 14.12.2015 16:22, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
We always have to call find_base() in order to force libldap to open
the socket. However, if no base is actually required then there is
no reason to error out if find_base() fails. This condition can arise
when anonymous binds are disabled.
Hell
We always have to call find_base() in order to force libldap to open
the socket. However, if no base is actually required then there is
no reason to error out if find_base() fails. This condition can arise
when anonymous binds are disabled.From 7cb7a7da4271101b7ad089d90716a27dd2041c0d Mon Sep 17 00
