URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/379
Title: #379: Packaging: Add placeholder and IPA commands packages
tiran commented:
"""
I have postponed the ```ipacommands``` part. Placeholders are covered by #472.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/379
Title: #379: Packaging: Add placeholder and IPA commands packages
pvoborni commented:
"""
If there is reason it can be maintained in IPA, but what is the reason?
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/379
Title: #379: Packaging: Add placeholder and IPA commands packages
tiran commented:
"""
I don't mind to maintain my own copy of ipacommands with ```ipa-getkeytab```
until we agree on a permanent solution.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/379
Title: #379: Packaging: Add placeholder and IPA commands packages
MartinBasti commented:
"""
We need placeholder package for sure, this PR should be splitted into 2, but
I'm still not endorsed to have ipa-getkeytab installable by pip
"""
See
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/379
Title: #379: Packaging: Add placeholder and IPA commands packages
pvoborni commented:
"""
I thought that I understand why this PR is needed bud in fact I don't. Ticket
#6484 is closed. Why is it attached to it?
How will the pypi packaging
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/379
Title: #379: Packaging: Add placeholder and IPA commands packages
tiran commented:
"""
The ```ipa``` and ```freeipa``` packages are necessary to prevent typo
squatting or name squatting attacks, e.g.
