On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 19:31 -0500, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 9/22/2011 7:24 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
2) Some DNS records may be pretty large. MX record data is small, but
for example CERT records have an entire certificate stored in it.
Wouldn't there be a problem if we place the large DNS
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:05 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/22/2011 08:31 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
OPEN QUESTION: should we implement these new commands also for discrete
DNS records types to be consistent? I mean for example A, , CNAME,
PTR, ... They would look like
ipa
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:59:01PM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 09/22/2011 03:37 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:25:01AM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 21.9.2011 23:55, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 09/21/2011 10:27 AM, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/20/2011 11:11 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/23/2011 02:02 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:05 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/22/2011 08:31 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
OPEN QUESTION: should we implement these new commands also for discrete
DNS records types to be consistent? I mean for example A, , CNAME,
PTR,
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 10:46 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/23/2011 02:02 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:05 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/22/2011 08:31 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
OPEN QUESTION: should we implement these new commands also for discrete
DNS records types
On 09/23/2011 11:52 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
On 09/23/2011 02:02 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:05 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/22/2011 08:31 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
OPEN QUESTION: should we implement these new commands also for
discrete
DNS
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 13:17 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/23/2011 11:52 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
On 09/23/2011 02:02 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:05 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/22/2011 08:31 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
OPEN QUESTION: should we
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:22 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:22 -0500, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 9/20/2011 6:15 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
ACK. Proposal looks like it will work fairly easily with the UI.
We'll have to make some chagnes due to the Add doing something
On 9/22/2011 7:24 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
2) Some DNS records may be pretty large. MX record data is small, but
for example CERT records have an entire certificate stored in it.
Wouldn't there be a problem if we place the large DNS record in URL?
This is how the DNS record list page could be
On 09/22/2011 03:37 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:25:01AM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 21.9.2011 23:55, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 09/21/2011 10:27 AM, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/20/2011 11:11 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:02 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
This
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:58 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On 09/16/2011 02:25 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 08:12 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Whatever you do do not split this operation into a DEL+ADD, we want an
atomic modify operation in any case. as you do not want to have a race
On 09/21/2011 01:58 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
On 09/16/2011 02:25 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 08:12 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Whatever you do do not split this operation into a DEL+ADD, we want an
atomic modify operation in any case. as you do not want to have a race
where named
On 9/20/2011 6:15 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
ACK. Proposal looks like it will work fairly easily with the UI.
We'll have to make some chagnes due to the Add doing something
different based on the type, but that is the case anyway.
Yes, I was thinking how can we integrate this new API to WebUI.
On 09/16/2011 09:51 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:26 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
Your proposal seems fine for me. However I would recommend not to expose
routines for managing DNSSEC related records because DNSSEC is currently
not supported in the bind-dyndb-ldap. This doesn't
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 09:42 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:28 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/14/2011 12:18 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
Attached in the txt file. If you have any comments or suggestions to
this proposal, please let me know.
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 14:04 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 07:58 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 09:42 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:28 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/14/2011 12:18 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
Attached in the txt
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 08:12 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 14:04 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
How would that work? We are designing -add -show -mod commands for
mutlivalued LDAP attribute values, we should have some reference what
value we are modifying. Or did you mean
17 matches
Mail list logo
