Re: [Freeipa-devel] Where we are with SUDO?

2010-11-24 Thread JR Aquino
Progress! Ok, here is the latest data from the lab. The compat translation is almost there!!! * The sudoers container has correctly been moved out to the top of the tree. I think it only needs 1 small final edit, the sudo ldap default is to look for: ou=sudoers, rather than what is currently

Re: [Freeipa-devel] Where we are with SUDO?

2010-11-24 Thread Dmitri Pal
JR Aquino wrote: Progress! Ok, here is the latest data from the lab. The compat translation is almost there!!! * The sudoers container has correctly been moved out to the top of the tree. I think it only needs 1 small final edit, the sudo ldap default is to look for: ou=sudoers, rather

Re: [Freeipa-devel] Where we are with SUDO?

2010-11-23 Thread Nalin Dahyabhai
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 07:18:42PM +, JR Aquino wrote: On 11/18/10 3:11 PM, Dmitri Pal d...@redhat.com wrote: JR Aquino wrote: The IPA SudoRule Structure has largely been based off of what we are doing today with HBAC. HBAC does not distinguish between memberGroup or

[Freeipa-devel] Where we are with SUDO?

2010-11-18 Thread JR Aquino
On 11/18/10 8:16 AM, Nalin Dahyabhai na...@redhat.com wrote: snipit ToDo's: * Get sudo compat to translate usergroup/posix group's such that it can prepend a %groupname - notice that it is not fully qualified dn. If memberUser can point to either a user or a group, and we read a