IPA uses ipa as the package name for all translations,
even in the ipa-client package.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3695
--
Petr³
From 8ec85dd495faedda09286967cfa0706a08955848 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Viktorin pvikt...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:40:17 +0200
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:46:13AM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
IPA uses ipa as the package name for all translations,
even in the ipa-client package.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3695
---
ipa-client/ipa-client-common.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
Hello,
This patch addresses ticket https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3771.
ACK.
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
On 07/18/2013 07:56 PM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
Hello,
This patch addresses ticket https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3771.
ACK. Pushed to master, ipa-3-2.
Martin
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
Remove word 'field' from GECOS param label
No other param/field has 'field' in a label.
--
Petr Vobornik
From a7f58da057c41c0902fde6b4f0c66d6ba5d5fdec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Vobornik pvobo...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:35:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove word 'field' from
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:44:57PM +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Remove word 'field' from GECOS param label
No other param/field has 'field' in a label.
I'm not sure I'm in favour of the change. Calling it just GECOS does
not make much sense because as an informational field in /etc/passwd,
it
On Friday 19 of July 2013 12:32:04 Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
I still need to test this with AD 2008. Sending so that code can get some
review before that.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3649
Tomas
This version fixes few small build nitpicks.
TomasFrom
On 07/19/2013 02:20 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:44:57PM +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Remove word 'field' from GECOS param label
No other param/field has 'field' in a label.
I'm not sure I'm in favour of the change. Calling it just GECOS does
not make much sense because
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:17:49PM +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Disclaimer: I have no strong feelings in this matter, it just looks
weird to me, so I'm OK with not doing it if it's general consensus.
Originally we wanted to do this change in
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3569 but it
On 19.7.2013 13:10, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 07/18/2013 05:29 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.7.2013 17:26, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/18/2013 05:22 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.7.2013 17:07, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/18/2013 04:53 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Added patch which adds new hidden
On 07/19/2013 03:49 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 19.7.2013 13:10, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 07/18/2013 05:29 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.7.2013 17:26, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/18/2013 05:22 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.7.2013 17:07, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/18/2013 04:53 PM, Jan Cholasta
On 07/18/2013 05:50 PM, James wrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 12:11 +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Hide delete button in multivalued widget if attr is not writable
Hey,
Maybe it would be a good idea to set the disabled state of the button
instead of removing it? That way it's obvious that some
I will reply to the rest of the message later if necessary, still
digesting some of your answers, but I wanted to address the following
first.
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 18:29 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
The most important question at the moment is What can we postpone?
How
fragile it can be for
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 17:59 +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Hello,
Note: the button is actually in a form of a link
I didn't notice this before.
Sorry for the noise.
James
The approach you're proposing is often valid and a preferred one but
I
don't think it's the best approach for our
On 07/19/2013 09:26 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:17:49PM +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Disclaimer: I have no strong feelings in this matter, it just looks
weird to me, so I'm OK with not doing it if it's general consensus.
Originally we wanted to do this change in
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013, Tomas Babej wrote:
On Friday 19 of July 2013 12:32:04 Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
I still need to test this with AD 2008. Sending so that code can get some
review before that.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3649
Tomas
This version fixes few small build nitpicks.
Hello,
The FreeIPA team is happy to welcome you to a Fedora Test Day that is
being held on Thursday, July 25th.
We would like to invite you to take part in testing of the upcoming FreeIPA 3.3
release containing 2 major improvements for easier deployment of FreeIPA Active
Directory Trust feature
17 matches
Mail list logo
