On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 00:25 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello Nathaniel,
sanitize_input translates MOD/REPLACE into MOD/DEL+MOD/ADD. It
looks good but difficult to think to all possible cases.
I think to the following corner case:
The initial entry has
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 18:46 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 00:25:34 +0200
thierry bordaz tbor...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello Nathaniel,
sanitize_input translates MOD/REPLACE into MOD/DEL+MOD/ADD. It
looks good but difficult to think to all possible cases.
I think
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 08:51 +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 16.9.2014 v 19:32 Nathaniel McCallum napsal(a):
We perform this enforcement at the API level since:
* DS level enforcement would be difficult
* ipatokenUniqueID generation already happens at the API level
It may be nice
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 12:31 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/17/2014 08:51 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 16.9.2014 v 19:32 Nathaniel McCallum napsal(a):
We perform this enforcement at the API level since:
* DS level enforcement would be difficult
* ipatokenUniqueID generation
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:39:48 -0400
Nathaniel McCallum npmccal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 00:25 +0200, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello Nathaniel,
sanitize_input translates MOD/REPLACE into MOD/DEL+MOD/ADD.
It looks good but difficult to think to all possible cases.
