Dne 3.10.2014 v 17:02 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 10/03/2014 04:59 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 3.10.2014 v 16:47 Petr Vobornik napsal(a):
On 3.10.2014 16:24, Martin Kosek wrote:
NACK. I will not comment on mechanics, if you get an ACK from Honza, it
is good enough. I just do not like the API.
On 10/03/2014 05:03 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 3.10.2014 16:46, Simo Sorce wrote:
I did not do any ACI work in the patch yet. I assume that we would like
to add the attr into 'System: Read Host|Service' permission. But I
think that write right should have it's own permission.
I have added
On 10/06/2014 10:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 3.10.2014 v 17:02 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 10/03/2014 04:59 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 3.10.2014 v 16:47 Petr Vobornik napsal(a):
On 3.10.2014 16:24, Martin Kosek wrote:
NACK. I will not comment on mechanics, if you get an ACK from Honza, it
On 10/06/2014 01:31 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 10/03/2014 05:02 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
[...]
I like these the best. Maybe with a -to or -by suffix.
or if we expect more operations in a future:
ipa host-allow-operation HOSTNAME --operation read-keys --users=STR
--groups STR
ipa
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:53:57 +0200
Martin Kosek mko...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/06/2014 10:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 3.10.2014 v 17:02 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 10/03/2014 04:59 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 3.10.2014 v 16:47 Petr Vobornik napsal(a):
On 3.10.2014 16:24, Martin Kosek
Hi,
I have started a new section on the design page 'Migrating existing
environments to Trust' aka Views about how the data is stored in the
cache of SSSD at
http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Migrating_existing_environments_to_Trust#SSSD_Cache_layout
Comments and suggestions are welcome.
bye,
On 10/06/2014 03:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:53:57 +0200
Martin Kosek mko...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/06/2014 10:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 3.10.2014 v 17:02 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 10/03/2014 04:59 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 3.10.2014 v 16:47 Petr Vobornik
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:49:09 +0200
Martin Kosek mko...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/06/2014 03:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:53:57 +0200
Martin Kosek mko...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/06/2014 10:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 3.10.2014 v 17:02 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On
On 6.10.2014 15:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 10/06/2014 03:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:53:57 +0200
Martin Kosek mko...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/06/2014 10:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 3.10.2014 v 17:02 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On 10/03/2014 04:59 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 10/06/2014 04:15 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 6.10.2014 15:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 10/06/2014 03:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:53:57 +0200
Martin Kosek mko...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/06/2014 10:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 3.10.2014 v 17:02 Martin Kosek napsal(a):
Hi Alex,
one quick comment:
I'm afraid the only case where slapi_search_internal_pb() returns -1 is
if you don't provide a pblock. In all other cases it returns 0 and you
have to check:
slapi_pblock_get(search_pb, SLAPI_PLUGIN_INTOP_RESULT, result);
Ludwig
Ludwig
On 10/01/2014 06:16 PM,
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi Alex,
one quick comment:
I'm afraid the only case where slapi_search_internal_pb() returns -1
is if you don't provide a pblock. In all other cases it returns 0 and
you have to check:
slapi_pblock_get(search_pb, SLAPI_PLUGIN_INTOP_RESULT,
On 10/06/2014 04:44 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi Alex,
one quick comment:
I'm afraid the only case where slapi_search_internal_pb() returns -1
is if you don't provide a pblock. In all other cases it returns 0 and
you have to check:
On 10/06/2014 04:57 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 10/06/2014 04:44 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi Alex,
one quick comment:
I'm afraid the only case where slapi_search_internal_pb() returns -1
is if you don't provide a pblock. In all other cases
On 10/03/2014 09:24 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4610
Our test suite is currently not very maintainable. I want to dedicate
some time to improve this.
The biggest part of this effort will be switching to a different test
framework, [pytest]. Compared to
Hi all,
The Dogtag lightweight sub-CAs design has undergone major revision
and expansion ahead of beginning the implementation (I plan to begin
later this week). This feature will provide an API for admins to
create sub-CAs for separate security domains and augment the
existing API so that
16 matches
Mail list logo
