[Freeipa-devel] [wiki] please review: domain levels overview page

2016-02-09 Thread Martin Basti
Hello, I prepared page for keeping the information about domain levels, what are features, which version introduced the particular domain level. http://www.freeipa.org/page/Domain_Levels Martin^2 -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [wiki] please review: domain levels overview page

2016-02-09 Thread Fraser Tweedale
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:14:47AM +0100, Martin Basti wrote: > Hello, > > I prepared page for keeping the information about domain levels, what are > features, which version introduced the particular domain level. > > http://www.freeipa.org/page/Domain_Levels > > Martin^2 > Thanks, it is a

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 0407] make lint: migration to config file and pylint plugin due pylint 1.5.2

2016-02-09 Thread Martin Basti
On 03.02.2016 10:19, David Kupka wrote: On 01/02/16 14:18, Martin Basti wrote: On 26.01.2016 14:16, Martin Basti wrote: On 20.01.2016 14:38, Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, On 19.1.2016 13:43, Martin Basti wrote: New pylint version will broke our custom make-lint script again, attached patch

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 0407] make lint: migration to config file and pylint plugin due pylint 1.5.2

2016-02-09 Thread David Kupka
On 09/02/16 11:28, Martin Basti wrote: On 03.02.2016 10:19, David Kupka wrote: On 01/02/16 14:18, Martin Basti wrote: On 26.01.2016 14:16, Martin Basti wrote: On 20.01.2016 14:38, Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, On 19.1.2016 13:43, Martin Basti wrote: New pylint version will broke our custom

Re: [Freeipa-devel] FreeIPA Cloud/Openstack Configuration?

2016-02-09 Thread Petr Spacek
On 31.1.2016 10:39, Dan Lavu wrote: > I started playing around with Openstack and was installing FreeIPA on a > tenant > network and I wanted to replicate to a server on provider network or another > network entirely. If you are not familiar with Openstack, a lot of cloud > implementations

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 0002] Refactor test_group_plugin

2016-02-09 Thread Milan Kubík
On 01/28/2016 10:42 AM, Filip Skola wrote: - Original Message - On 01/25/2016 11:11 AM, Filip Skola wrote: - Original Message - On 01/15/2016 03:38 PM, Filip Skola wrote: Hi, sending rebased patch. F. - Original Message - Hello, sorry for delays. The patch no

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [patch 0032] ipatests: add missing certprofile fixture

2016-02-09 Thread Milan Kubík
On 02/09/2016 02:37 PM, Milan Kubík wrote: Fixes the CA ACL tests broken by removed import. This patch doesn't rely on undocumented behavior of pytest. The patch invalidates patch 133 by Martin Babinsky. Patch updated with trac link -- Milan Kubik From

[Freeipa-devel] [patch 0032] ipatests: add missing certprofile fixture

2016-02-09 Thread Milan Kubík
Fixes the CA ACL tests broken by removed import. This patch doesn't rely on undocumented behavior of pytest. The patch invalidates patch 133 by Martin Babinsky. -- Milan Kubik From 73dc9e91605c9299e48cdf62ddc0eb4927471a57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Milan=20Kub=C3=ADk?=

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [wiki] please review: domain levels overview page

2016-02-09 Thread Martin Basti
On 09.02.2016 12:07, Fraser Tweedale wrote: On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:14:47AM +0100, Martin Basti wrote: Hello, I prepared page for keeping the information about domain levels, what are features, which version introduced the particular domain level.

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCHES] 0761-0769 More Python3 fixes

2016-02-09 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 01/29/2016 09:42 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote: > On 29.1.2016 09:25, Jan Cholasta wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 27.1.2016 18:38, Petr Viktorin wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Here is a mixed bag of Python 3 fixes. >>> They fix some tests, and they should enable you to use `python3 >>> /usr/bin/ipa`. >> >> Patch

[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] CI: Add simple replication test in 2-connected topology.

2016-02-09 Thread David Kupka
This topology should be closer to the ones in real world than our current ones. But it is still impractical and (hopefully) no one has such deployment. If some user could share his/her deployment topology I will be happy to create generator based on it. -- David Kupka From